> universe's frequently unhappy truths.

This phrase is usually used to force through otherwise unpopular economic policies. But here’s the thing, this isn’t actually an argument. You’re unilaterally asserting that you’re right and that anyone who disagrees with you is a child that refuses to accept “hard truths”. But you have offered literally no evidence for your assertions, only bluster. This is mere abuse of rhetoric, not an argument.

Oh, and it’s funny how only other people have an “agenda”. As if you aren’t also expressing a policy preference too.