Hacker News Reader

Comment by adito | Hacker News Reader

I beg to disagree with you. I'm newbie and I still found that zig standard library still daunting to read. When people said it's very accessible, I'm curious what people mean by that? What makes it very accessible?

View on HN

I am also a zig newbie. Since zig is a relatively simple language, I've found it easy enough to read and understand what is going on in the zig standard library, even if I don't understand the particular details of some language syntax. Of course experience and background is going to play in here.

The zig standard library does the following to help me:

- Logical, straightforward code, no magic incantations

- Well named variables and functions

- Comments

- Folder structure is easy to navigate

- Easy to find on github - not hidden away

Obviously your mileage may vary.

I can't put my finger on it. I love ruby, but often times digging deeper into Ruby source code, I would hit a point where I would think, "oh God, I give up, this is magic". Comparing it to elixir, my daily driver, is like night and day. Usually I can figure out what is happening (there are a few places, like Phoenix Routes and Ecto Query Builders where I have gotten stimied). Zig is even better - especially at the stdlib level

> I'm newbie and I still found that zig standard library still daunting to read

If you're a newbie, why are you learning an experimental language?

Even noobs can love languages. I'm a noob at compilers and I routinely beat my head against implementation. I do this, not because I will succeed, but because I enjoy the challenge.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com