Wallets != people. Without proof of personhood, you never know the distribution.
It's like the elections being stolen, or anti-vax propaganda or whatever other idiocy being spread on FB on any given moment.
>95% of Bitcoin is owned by 2%
This is just the lower limit on the concentration of wealth in Bitcoin, found from onchain data. Since people can have multiple addresses it is possible that the 2% actually control 97% or even more of btc supply
More specifically: assuming we can't derive it by some clever means, or approximate it from some tax reporting data, isn't it a problem that we can't get such a distribution?
I mean this not as a moral judgement, but more as a system dynamics concern. It's easy enough to see how wealth concentration can destabilize a money/value system absent other factors. So my concern isn't about what's right or wrong socially, but whether there might be a reason to question the implicit trust that the maths will work out.