Smart guns finally arriving in U.S., seeking to shake up firearms market
reuters.com
reuters.com
The reasoning: if guns were safer, people who normally wouldn’t purchase guns would end up purchasing guns.
But that's not a problem, is it? Because anti-gun groups aren't against guns per se, just against the harms caused by guns, right?
I suppose there is some small percentage of the US population who don't own a gun because they are afraid of their child using it, for example, so they might end up buying one of these smart guns and then, at a later date, using it to commit suicide themselves, whereas without easy access to a gun they might have had a mental health intervention instead. I'm not sure if that group is bigger than the number of lives that would be saved by smart guns replacing non-smart guns (assuming the technology works) though.
Anyway, the really interesting questions are what happens if the federal government tried banning non-smart guns. I think a reasonable objection is that this is a prima facie shift in the balance of power between the federal government and the militia (rather than, say, a consumer safety benefit) unless the mandate also applies to federally procured weapons too.
Has anyone put this to the real world test? i.e. Give one of these smart firearms to a few dozen gunsmiths, locksmiths or other curious tinkerers and hardware hackers? Bounty programs?
Anyone here on HN own one of these? How long does it take to disengage the lock if you are the authorized owner?
Here's a video of the presentation from YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3f0p3vTY-c
I think it was also covered on HN at the time.