That’s not a criticism of the individuals there, just a recognition of the conditions.
Admittedly that’s not any easy thing to define all the time.
Which nations are truly free then?
If you can tell the President on Christmas Eve "Let's Go Brandon" which means something vulgar and you don't go to jail then you live in a free country
If you are incarcerated in a re-education camp because of your religion then you live in an unfree country
Edit: Ah, silly me. That was just a thinly veiled insult against China, the great big devil.
Everyone, the reporter included, knew fully well what the crowds were chanting. That phrase sums in 3 words how corrupt the media is to whitewash and censor any criticism of the establishment president and the mainstream narrative.
The US is orders of magnitude different to and better than China, but still has room for improvement.
US citizen: I live in a free country! Nobody will prosecute me if I go next to White House and shout out loud "<name of US president>! You are an old stupid son of a bitch!"
USSR citizen: I also live in a free country! Nobody will prosecute me if I go to Red Square and shout out loud "<name of US president>! You are an old stupid son of a bitch!"
Let's go Brandon is not widely known, I am inclined to think, to the typical audience of President's Christmas Eve address. It does not warrant any action because of this.
War is productivity. Wage slavery is freedom. Nationalism is strength.
I grew up under military dictatorship in Latin America. Back then you could get in serious trouble if you said or did the wrong thing. There is a lot more “freedom” now but the people are still oppressed by their own social condition. Plus ça change…
Yes I know there's a series of specific Samsung models that are approved for US govt use and are likely made in a facility in south Korea.
I think we have two categories of things
A) phones made in China with software/OS load for CCP compliant censorship and data collection
B) phones made in China with software and OS load for the global market (example would be oxygenOS on an English language OnePlus phone. If it turns out there's hidden data collection or censorship frameworks in oxygenOS I would be very disappointed.)
https://news.samsung.com/us/samsung-devices-achieve-approval...
https://www.samsung.com/us/business/solutions/industries/gov...
Apple: I trust their US QA to detect planted spyware.
Apparently /e/OS, the free Android distribution by Mandrake founder Gaël Duval, is available pre-installed, so there should be solid LineageOS support.
Where something is made doesn't tell us where the components are sourced however. It is MediaTek based, so make of that what you will.
If they're the kind that's sold artificially cheap under the assumption that they can make up the difference by showing you ads for the whole lifetime of the device, running a different OS has the added benefit of eating into their profit margins.
Vendors that are LineageOS-friendly include Google, OnePlus, Xiaomi, and Asus.[3] If you already have a Xiaomi phone, replacing the stock operating system with LineageOS could improve your privacy.
[1] https://developer.sony.com/develop/open-devices/get-started/...
[2] https://www.theverge.com/2021/8/24/22639869/samsung-galaxy-z...
I have nothing against wanting to protect and industry, but it should not be done with misconceptions.
How does "protectionism" have anything to do with this? It's weird to inject that economic framing into a question about what kind of policies you want to be subject to, and who you want to be setting those policies.