In what way is democracy to be considered destabilizing?
Looking at history and at the present moment, one could say that instability is an inherent feature of human society, but that democracy substantially reduces that instability.
In what way is democracy to be considered destabilizing?
Looking at history and at the present moment, one could say that instability is an inherent feature of human society, but that democracy substantially reduces that instability.
This is a feature of the autocracy being overthown, and not necessarily a feature of the system of government that replaces it.
And this is quite fundamental to the autocratic model. Coming in #2 in a democratic contest for power means you don’t get to be President. Coming in #2 in an autocratic contest for power means losing your property, liberty and likely life. The former encourages reconciliation. The latter, challenging the outcome at all costs.
I think it's interesting to think of the receiving side of this as well: how stable are democratic allies when their foreign policy can change election cycle to election cycle?