I am curious why you call him "serial abuser", does he have previous convictions already?

For now, it is "he says she says" situation, and court proceeding will show details in the future.

Hi [name redacted], thank you for providing a way to verify the document. That is really great. As a brief explanation. I was genuinely surprised by the publishing format. This is entirely unrelated to the content of the document. I had not seen google drive as a way to self-publish before. So my intention was not (at least not consciously) to doubt the validity of the claim, but more of a meta-comment. I don‘t know [redacted] (and had never heard of him before). I am sorry if you were hurt by him (as you mentioned in another comment).

It's not so easy, connecting [name redacted] and [redacted] without resorting to OP's writing was quite tricky - after looking at some Dropbox patents I _think_ that's the same person, but still ain't sure.

...I'm not mystified about claims of friendship with Nat Friedman - I don't have a high opinion of the latter, I see evidence of friendship with other Open Source folks, and that kind of people tends to be "friends" with _a lot_ of people.

Hi YXN, as a brief explanation. I was genuinely surprised by the publishing format. This is entirely unrelated to the content of the document. I had not seen google drive as a way to self-publish before.