Mayo Clinic fires 700 unvaccinated employees
cbsnews.com
cbsnews.com
They have a reputation to maintain, and whether there is a hard scientific basis for this or not, I can see it being in their best interest to be able to state to their customers (ie, very sick people) that "all Mayo Clinic employees have been fully vaccinated".
People go to Mayo when they are very sick. It's not like the general population going to the grocery store. When you have a concentration of sick people in poor health, it makes complete sense to me to reduce their risk as much as possible, and vaccinated employees is part of that IMO.
I don't know if they have a policy of patients requiring vaccination, but if they did, I think it would be a good thing for the same reason: you have two huge buildings (in the Rochester, MN location) that are full of sick, weakened, vulnerable people who need specialized help. The last thing they want or need is to be exposed to Covid while seeking treatment.
Secondly, if someone already had Covid, they have prior immunity. Thirdly, vaccination doesn't prevent catching or spreading Covid. This has been made clear with Omicron data.
Their policy is not rational nor science based. It smacks of being punitive more than anything.
The only way to justify this is reduced transmission, enough so that it outweighs the harm to patients done by firing staff in the current supply-constrained healthcare economy.
No, the only way to justify it is that even with a largely mild disease, the total number of hospitalized patients is saturating the health care system. Which it is, therefore it is justified.
Reducing employee hospitalization by firing them doesn't strike me as particularly sensible...
It may be due many number of things, but it is clearly not safer to work with vaccinated coworkers if that study is correct. -- [0]: https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/52810/is-the-ef...
Source: my So worked in a hospital which did this and was there to see 177 people get laid off for missing their shots