> correct me if I'm wrong
I don't even remotely have the expertise for that, if applicable others would have to do that. But thanks a lot for elaborating!
I don't even remotely have the expertise for that, if applicable others would have to do that. But thanks a lot for elaborating!
That original argument is interesting and is a surprising obervation to me, and I would love to read a well-written piece on that. Just keep in mind that "statistically unlikely" doesn't immediately mean "it's unlikely", you might have used the wrong presumption (in this case, silent mutation being not really silent).