The creator of bitcoin is worth $73 billion. Remind me why it isn't considered a ponzi scheme. Web3 is blockchain technology, it's AI. It's a meaningless buzzword startups use to sound innovative.
Don't forget that 10 years later noone knows who the creator is either, despite them being multi billionaire and able to crash the entire market at once.
But they are obviously charitable and nothing will happen.
Unrelated to the content of the article, what's up with censoring "wtf" in the title? I often see links with "WTF" (usually in caps) in the title, so I don't think this is coming from the HN side. Is this an edit by the submitter? This makes it a bit hard to understand what is the article about. Or is "wtf" not okay now? I've never lived in America so it's hard to understand what's okay and what's not around swearing.
A successful Web3 (if we want to use the term) project should be unfundable to capitalists. That's what makes this so hard. Teach people how to not be wage slaves, then people won't throw away all their power to the already-wealthy.