Ultra High Resolution Photo of Night Watch (2022)
rijksmuseum.nl
rijksmuseum.nl
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_hm5oX7ZlE
[2] https://hyper-resolution.org/Nightwatch5
[3] https://hyper-resolution.org/view.html?mode=trumpet&pointer=...
Of course, high res copies of these is a great thing to do as well. The above comment should take nothing away from that. They're just different things with different purposes.
0: https://www.schiphol.nl/en/at-schiphol/discover/facilities/r...
> This is the largest and most detailed photo ever taken of a work of art. It is 717 gigapixels, or 717,000,000 pixels, in size.
One of the numbers above is off by a factor of 1,000
It's 925 000 px × 775 000 px which is 717 gigapixels (9 zeros).
Actually a more interesting question: Does this new image dataset fall under 'newer' copyright laws / rights and is it copyrighted for the next 80 or so years, or does it fall under the copyright law of the original image, that is, expired?
Previous posting from 2020:
My first reaction (after amazement) was to imagine a machine coloring in the cracks. The future will always see any effort in this direction as primitive. Why didn't we wait for their tools?
A full-scale reproduction, recreating the feeling of the painting when it was new, doesn't have that problem. I want a robotic setup that scans, and 3D prints elsewhere with paint.
Meanwhile, does the art restoration world place a premium on using dissimilar materials, that prevent further disintegration while fooling the eye, but are easily distinguished by future scanning techniques? I can imagine purists insisting on "authentic" materials that will be confused with the original painting in the future.
Yes - as I understand it, restoration involves careful use of solvents to remove old layers of varnish/added paint, followed by a new coat of varnish to protect the original underlying paint, followed by inpainting/overpainting (filling on cracks and/or painting over damage). This is done using materials that can be easily removed by future restorers without damaging the original. I imagine these layers would show up on a sufficiently high-res scan, too.
[1] https://hyper-resolution.org/view.html?pointer=0.326,0.666&r...
[2] https://www.metmuseum.org/about-the-met/conservation-and-sci...
[3] https://hyper-resolution.org/view.html?pointer=0.522,0.466&r...
[4] https://hyper-resolution.org/view.html?pointer=0.551,0.619&r...
[5] https://hyper-resolution.org/view.html?pointer=0.500,0.527&r...
Flying around in NightWatchPunk1642. Pre-order soon!
Sam Vimes
Link to an interview with Paul Kidby about the night watch cover art:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.fantasybookreview.co.uk/blo...