Horrible insurance kerfuffle gone good
blog.plover.com
blog.plover.com
I had a time when I was late making a payment and she was pretty abusive about it even though I was offering to pay right away.
I've talked to many people in business who were frustrated about a payment being past due but until then everyone I met was 100% cool after I told them it was a mistake and payment in full was immediately forthcoming.
I've been thinking about changing my insurance but there are numerous features about my house that make it hard to insure, such as the fact that it doesn't have central heat. (I've got the same propane heater you see in many anime and also two wood stoves though.) It is coming up in February and maybe this year I will look for a new agent.
I start getting renewal notices saying I would lose coverage, and every time I received one I would call the office and the assistant would offer to stop the message, since my account was closed. Then I would receive a voicemail that "why don't you tell me about your situation, maybe I can get you a better rate." Told this to the assistant the next time, and she would again promise to get it cancelled. After several months I just gave up because my account was cancelled. But I would still receive a mailer from the lobbying arm of the Farm Bureau, and warnings that, without paying the annual Farm Bureau membership I could not receive insurance coverage. So I started calling the office again, same runaround.
I got fed up enough that I finally emailed the Farm Bureau complaint department, detailing the mail I continued to receive that all vaguely suggested I was delinquent on insurance. The next day I got a worried voicemail from the agent, offering to immediately cancel my account, and he could do it retroactive to the date I originally gave him. Based on the communication I got from the organization it must have gone straight to his supervisor, who have him an earful. I hadn't even mentioned the rebate I was supposed to receive.
A week later I received the refund in the mail, and I have been pleasantly free from the Farm Bureau's bills and propaganda ever since.
>The new guy was able to arrange new coverage for me with an insurance premium 15% lower than the one Brenda had gotten me.
>Brenda had arranged too much insurance for me; I was paying to have the Company S agree to spend up to $X to rebuild my house, but rebuilding the house couldn't possibly cost more than $⅔X.
I honestly don't understand the approach of blindly trusting someone with a clear incentive to extract the maximum amount of cash from you, and then be surprised that they did what they were incentivized to do. Also, the general rule of thumb is that middlemen tend to increase prices and reduce efficiency, so unless there's a legal requirement to conduct business through them (e.g. car dealerships), it's always better to go directly to the vendor.
There's also a particular type of middlemen with asymmetric incentives (i.e. rewarded if the deal goes though, but not penalized if it fails). This setup usually attracts the most lazy and useless kind of people that would just sit on their ass, reassuring you that everything is great, and would then act surprised and shrug once it all goes to hell. Because, well, they still get their commission from the other contracts that panned out (with no help from them).
I don't know if it's specific to Canada, but when I needed to get house insurance, I just went directly to several insurance companies, answered the questionnaires and got estimates. I then got an appointment with the one I chose and was able to get a very itemized quote (fire/theft/flood/etc) and even tweak it (e.g. lower the rate by raising deductibles). No sit-on-their-ass middleman would do this for me.
Also, on a side note, when you are buying a house, you usually start with a conditional offer that gives you about a week to do a house inspection and secure a mortgage, before committing to the purchase. Doing a thorough house inspection at that point would cost you about $500 and would find all the issues that bothered the insurance company BEFORE you make the final decision whether you want that house for that price.
And in fact the amount by which I was being overcharged was relatively small.
With “market search” middlemen, the reason people who are aware that middlemen add cost go with them anyway is the perception (which can be more or less accurate in different markets) that while there is an added cost compared to the best direct deal with the best vendor, it is worthwhile because there is a savings after considering value of time and the likely matrix of direct deals vs time invested in securing them. This may be more justified in the same market than it would be on its own when the item with the middleman is a necessary component of a larger transaction with other moving pieces that require attention, which can increase the opportunity cost of time focussed on that one piece.