Astronomers uncover largest group of rogue planets yet
sciencedaily.com
sciencedaily.com
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worlds_in_Collision
It may not be very good as science fiction, but it's an interesting historical/social phenomenon.
[1] https://xeelee.fandom.com/wiki/Silver_Ghosts
[2] Best read in the form of summaries and compilations of world-building backstory.
I've been fascinated by the idea of detecting rogue planets ever since and it's incredible they found so many. Unfortunately, it looks like their detection method might not be useful for older (billion+) or rocky planets (from the footnote):
> The exact number of rogue planets found by the team is hard to pin down because the observations don't allow the researchers to measure the masses of the probed objects. Objects with masses higher than about 13 times the mass of Jupiter are most likely not planets, so they cannot be included in the count. However, since the team didn't have values for the mass, they had to rely on studying the planets' brightness to provide an upper limit to the number of rogue planets observed. The brightness is, in turn, related to the age of the planets themselves, as the older the planet, the longer it has been cooling down and reducing in brightness. If the studied region is old, then the brightest objects in the sample are likely above 13 Jupiter masses, and below if the region is on the younger side. Given the uncertainty in the age of the study region, this method gives a rogue planet count of between 70 and 170.
That said, this is exciting news!
> The study suggests there could be many more of these elusive, starless planets that we have yet to discover. "There could be several billions of these free-floating giant planets roaming freely in the Milky Way without a host star," Bouy explains.
13 Mj is on the low side of the definition. It's not a definitive number and goes as high as 80 Mj, depending who you ask.
These numbers depend on a lot of details of stellar atmospheres.
I took a graduate-level Stellar Atmospheres class from S. Kumar, who first theorized about this class of not-quite-star.
Not that we ever actually have to worry about a collision with a rogue planet.
> Some scientists believe rogue planets can form from the collapse of a gas cloud that is too small to lead to the formation of a star, or that they could have been kicked out from their parent system. But which mechanism is more likely remains unknown.
Am I correct that the latter mechanism can lead to a wider variety of planet compositions, since you have the wind off the forming star to blow off lightweight layers depending on how close to the star formation happens?
More in topic, I really like the idea of random planets floating the void on their own. I'd be really curious about they have a unique composition. Although the lack of an external energy source probably means there wouldn't be much potential for activity.