After reading this, I'm even more confused about what autism is than before.
Sure, my current knowledge may be wrong, but tearing down any generalizations "if you met one person with autism, you met one person with autism" just makes it impossible to define as a thing separate from non-autism.
Yet the author tries to create generalizations later? Autistic people experience the world in a different way than non-autistic people.
Okay, let's let this inconsistency slide. So to what extent? Are they trying to say that all non-autistic people perceive the world exactly the same way? Nonsense, so where's the line?
From the article, there's no line: some are like this, some are the opposite.
I feel the points about the form of communication are valid, but the ones describing the actual subject of communication are not helping.