Hacker News Reader

Comment by arlcode | Hacker News Reader

You want to pull the cord a few seconds after exiting. 1...2...3...pull. Freefall is not the goal when bailing in case of an emergency.

View on HN

Especially in a case like this when you need to hike your way out. Then why not pull ASAP and then fly back towards civilization and look for the best possible landing spot.

You can also see much better landing spots when he's hanging in the shoot that he could easily make. So why the hell did he end up in a bush like that?

And why go look for the plane? Like just focus on getting to safety. Nothing in this video makes sense.

> And why go look for the plane?

You would attempt to go back to civilization ASAP...Unless you'd need to, for example, reenable the magnetos/fuel switch in order to avoid "embarrassing" questions from the authorities.

I mean, if you were far from civilization, it's probably best to wait for rescue next to the crashed plane, no? Much easier to spot from the air.

From the video it doesn't even look like he called atc. But to answer your question, yes. He would tell atc where he's going and where he can be found.

The thing about engine out situations is that it's not that hard to get to civilization before you bail out. These light aircraft glide great, he should have been able to ditch (or land) closer to a town or road.

Are these switches really robust enough that "flipped during crash" isn't a likely explanation you could give to the authorities?

Needing to return to the crash site to destroy the evidence feels like a very forced narrative to me (though I know nothing about flying).

some are. The mixture nob for example could easily survive this especially in a slow splane like this.

But I agree it's not the strongest argument

Wouldn’t you want to go back to the plane to see if anything survived the crash that will be useful to help you get back to civilization?

Radio, food, water, warmer clothes, first aid kit, and weapons are all things that are plausible to have in the plane that would be nice to have when trying to either hike out or get help.

There's a simple explanation for both. Freefall is more dramatic and you want to be low enough that you get some good shots of the plane crashing into terrain for your video. Both help increase view count.

Landing in a bush and climbing out from bramble is also more dramatic.

Unless you're a skydiver by trade in an emergency situation and you fall back on what is familiar to you?

Let's say instead they did pull the chute immediately after bailing and then used the extra altitude to sail back to safety. Would you be more inclined to believe the stunt was real?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com