When I first heard about this plan to "face check" articles on Facebook, I was actually floored because it's just such an obviously bad idea. There is always going to be a point where reasonable people disagree about what is correct and what isn't or what should be fact-checked and what shouldn't.

And you're not even dealing with reasonable people.

Even if you limit it to the most egregious cases that just shifts the problem. What's egregious and what isn't?

I actually believe it was well-intentioned. Just... completely misguided. You know what they say: the road to Hell is paved with good intentions.

Second thought: it's weird to me how many conservatives and conspiracy theorists (it's interesting that there's so much crossover between these two groups) are so keen to dismantle Section 230 when they benefit the most. In an effort for platforms to remain neutral, this nonsense is allowed to exist. If platforms were responsible for this "content", it'd be shut down so fast.

But here's a good thing to keep in mind: from a narcissist an accusation is actually a confession. Trump is a textbook narcissist. Go back and look at his accusations through that filter.