Hacker News Reader

85% of VAERS reports are made by physicians. 100% are validated by the CDC.

What’s important is to disqualify the best information available so you just have to accept vague assertions from authority.

View on HN

VAERS is not the best information available by any means, but it is indeed a valid source of information. The issue with the paper is that it misuses the information and draws conclusions that aren't actually indicated.

What other dataset are you using to inform yourself about vaccine related harm in the public?

Your question would seem to imply you've used VAERS to inform yourself, but I would contend you've relied on someone else's interpretation of it.

Is it the best dataset or do you have a better one?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com