Hacker News Reader

Comment by gruez | Hacker News Reader

>One off expenses don't happen 12 times a year.

so you'd be in favor of payday loans if they were limited to n times per year?

>If you haven't been able to save $100 a month for five months, you just won't be able to save five times as much, let's be realistic.

what about people who have the free cash flow, but can't save for various reasons? eg. friends/family asking for money, poor self control, etc.?

View on HN

For example, in Italy there's a special kind of payday loan that is limited by law to 1/5th of the net paycheck. It is taken off the paycheck by agreement between your bank and the lender's. The combination of these two rules makes them more likely to be paid successfully, and gives them a better APR than e.g. credit cards despite being essentially used for the same purpose as subprime payday loans in America. There's also a maximum legal APR of ~18% for these loans (it varies every quarter), which is better than e.g. the ~24% maximum legal APR of credit cards

Unbounded APR and "letting the market figure it out" is not the solution.

Isn't Italy topping the charts of countries in financial ruin? If it weren't for Greece being worse Italy would be in the headlines. If America is to change laws, it'd help to use a successful nation as an example

Interesting spin on the ad hominem, but I just mentioned what I know about since I live here. Anyway, we're talking about private debt; and while Italy has a huge public debt, its private debt is quite low.

BTW, right now US treasury bonds have a higher 10y yield than Italy.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com