how so?
also it doesn't impact Bitcoin, you can self-custody most of your wealth. Put what's needed to transact on lightning (checking account)
also it doesn't impact Bitcoin, you can self-custody most of your wealth. Put what's needed to transact on lightning (checking account)
In short, if it didn't (it does), then we've proven P = NP and the very foundation of Bitcoin itself crumbles.
Self custody of bitcoin is not self custody of wealth. Not your fiat not your wealth.
https://news.bitcoin.com/author/jonald/
drink the kool-aid , rather than trying the software itself.
good luck
read the book: the blocksize wars
Most people will only open one channel ever in their lifetime.
Your scenario is correct only if you will only send, most people won't, most people will first receive (get paid) then send.
Say someone wants in, he opens a $20 channel, maybe he wants to pay for some small stuf at first so $20 will do.
But then this person will get paid for his work, say $1k.. his channel isn't constrained to those first $20, this channel is now "widened" to $1k.
Everything that doesn't carry the coiner narrative of "number go up" is FUD
I don't have to show mathematical proof, but in fact, the code is open source, so you can go and see for yourself what I said is true and immutable.
The irony of a bitcoiner accusing someone else of drinking the Kool aid. Lots of people participated and made money in Madoff's scheme for decades too.