Why Google Analytics doesn't help to improve your product
stormly.com
stormly.com
In-depth product analytics is better, yes, but basic Google Analytics can go a long way to revealing user patterns and even certain basic issues.
For the most basic example: As a product manager I’ve used Google Analytics to show that most users weren’t interested in a new feature that a CxO level had been demanding, and also that a campaign to push users toward that feature had basically no effect on the numbers because they already knew they didn’t want it. Google Analytics made that demonstration dead simple and I didn’t have to use any developer time to generate those insights.
If you’re choosing between in-depth, custom product analytics or Google Analytics like the author is debating, you’ve probably ended up in a false dichotomy situation anyway. Anyone can have Google Analytics set up in hours and start seeing convenient data about how people are using your product, in a most basic sense.
I suggest changing the title to a more honest one, so other readers won't feel cheated like me.
I don't know why (maybe just years of the same pattern repeating with these types of articles) but as soon as I read the word "stormly" in the URL, despite having never heard about it before, I knew this would basically be a pitch for some other junk
Sure, organic clicks aren't always that helpful. But downloads, source for downloads, purchases, conversion funnel analysis etc. aren't vanity metrics and all are available with free google analytics; you just need to know how to set it up.
Does anyone here have experience with GA4 as an analytics package, is it good?