What I found remarkable about the list was the ones that were superficially appealing but fundamentally disastrous, in a way that takes more than a paragraph to explain why.

E.g., right at the top: Geoengineering, really? Maybe he does not know the expression "termination shock". Or "ocean acidification". And, does the author know nothing of the history of nukes in the US? Nuke projects nowadays produce $10B+ ratepayer debt and, ten years on, zero watts.