Hacker News Reader

(4) Bring up irrelevant issues as frequently as possible.

(5) Haggle over precise wordings of communications, minutes, resolutions.

Now now, this should go through the proper channels...

Maybe we should form a committee to decide what those channels are before we do anything too brash?

I both hate and love you all at the same time.

Call me nostalgic, but this reminds me of the good old days on slashdot

Please be reasonable.

I got this.

@dang-- can you please change "CIA's" to "Open Source Software's" in the title?

Thanks.

but most people have no idea what OSS is. the CIA is the natural successor of OSS.

You got trapped, he used the manual to make you waste your time on irrelevant stuff, and mine now :D

I had read parts of the manual years ago, and I concede quickly enough got bored. All we need to sabotage a system is a little bit of imagination coupled with paranoia to sustain damage long term.

> but most people have no idea what OSS is. the CIA is the natural successor of OSS.

That still doesn't make the headline correct, though. CIA simply didn't exist in WW2.