People love to say everything is a "human right" - IMO human rights should delineate what you can't be deprived of - not what you have the "right" to force others to provide to you if you do not have the capacity to be self sufficient
The state can’t take away my guns. The state doesn’t have to buy me any guns.
My right to own a gun, have free speech, against self incriminating, or against unlawful search and seizure require Absolutely no action on any person's part but mine besides the court to uphold them (which is true of all systems of rights. Having a court does not negate any of this).
The people who wrote the bill of rights were very aware of this delineation because they stayed exclusively on one side of it.
So you can disagree but to say the idea simply doesn't exist is nonsense.
What if you're my neighbor, exercising your free speech in person, and I don't want to hear it?
Your sound waves don't stop at my property line. But there are definite limits on what I could do in response.
https://nypost.com/2020/10/26/bill-gross-accused-of-tormenti...
Hunters go traipsing across private property. Someone with a gun could shoot your dog, or mistake you for a deer. Living around people like that is a huge infringement or obligation of property owners.
Water rights.