Stanford Accelerated Intelligent Neuromodulation Therapy for Depression
ajp.psychiatryonline.org
ajp.psychiatryonline.org
This article is incredibly frustrating. This is NOT new technology. It is a different modality called theta burst which they didn't even mention the name of in the article. The benefit of using theta burst is that you can do TMS courses much faster. This is a major benefit but the technology is still the same. If you didn't have remission with the prolonged rTMS course theta burst is not a magic bullet. The benefit is that it's easier to do bilateral treatment and speed up the treatment quite a bit. Normally you have to come in every business day for a few months for 20 mins at a time.
It really sucks to have "lay people" in my life email me these articles like this is some new breakthrough. The articles often come out prior to FDA approval but these modalities have been around for 10+ years prior and I always knew about them with someone with treatment resistant depression. Remember, off label treatments are a thing, and theta burst was available well before this study came out.
I'm currently undergoing deep TMS treatment with the Brainsway device on my left hemisphere and they were able to boost the treatment by adding the theta burst with the figure 8 coil like in the picture to do my right hemisphere to improve chances of remission. It is a good trick and it boosts your chances of remission because it's faster and easier to do bilateral but as I said there is nothing magical about theta burst other than it's a very fast treatment. Those who didn't have remission on long courses of TMS before unilaterally probably aren't going to magically have remission on this. What we might end up seeing is some kind of threshhold that wasn't achievable in the past, say that some people could reach remission but it's not feasible to come into the office every day for 6 months.
Anyway TMS is great and should be used more but I just hate these dumb articles. Especially since it's touting this as some magical new technology. No way. And we're still a long way from TMS being prescribed in general cases - less side effects than meds but insurance wise you have to trial and fail several meds before it's covered. Even SSRIs which are given out like candy can have severe side effects like GI bleeding. TMS is very, very safe with few side effects. For me it was just discomfort during the treatment but not after.
Also just got to say this quote summed up how ridiculous the article was for me: "“This study is hopefully just the tip of the iceberg,” said Siddiqi. “I think we're finally on the verge of a paradigm shift in how we think about psychiatric treatment, where we'll supplement the conventional chemical imbalance and psychological conflict models with a new brain circuit model.” In other words, psychiatrists will use electricity instead of talk therapy and drugs to treat mental health disorders." No reason to make rTMS sound like some Frankenstein tech and no, rTMS will not be used "instead of talk therapy and drugs".
TBH a little disappointed at hacker news, next time link to the study! I would love to see articles on NEW treatments for depression. Spoiler alert..there really haven't been any for a long time now. Just me too drugs and this is a bit of a me too tech as well.
SSRIs and SNRIs can cause akathisia. It happened to me, and it was by far the worst thing that happened to me ever in my life. I went through 6 months of nonstop hell with akathisia, and it was the worst 6 months of my life. Trust me, if you have severe akathisia, it is worse than death.
This is somebody who has akathisia from taking Effexor (an SNRI): https://youtu.be/W_iiy8ISvdY
This is a public service announcement from an akathisia advocacy group (known as Akathisia Alliance) about akathisia: https://youtu.be/VgvhAilA070
Here is an article from a mother whose son developed akathisia from taking an SSRI for about a week. (My story has a lot of common denominators to this one): https://www.madinamerica.com/2021/06/boy-interrupted-a-story...
SSRIs also INCREASE the risk of suicide and a trial with healthy people without history of behavioral health issues on Prozac ended in some of the patients dying this way. This has been a huge cover up and I'm not sure if these meds got the black box warning about this. It's easy to say "ohh these patients would have done that anyway, they're depressed" but that's not what the data shows...
I also had very strange differences in mood or tolerance between brands of generics, that I'd never had before with any med. I'd go from OK to crap in 2 weeks and my wife would link it to prescription renewal and pharmacist giving me whatever brand. I used to think it didn't matter...
Oh and venlafaxine is a bitch to taper out. Constant vertigo, nausea, ringing and tingling, migraines and the fun panic attacks...
If we can find better, please please please keep researching.
Agreed. The current push and research around ketamine/psilocybin is promising but can't come fast enough. Other than the ketamine spray which is still very hard to get and needs to be taken in office there have been no novel depression treatments for decades really.
> TBH a little disappointed at hacker news, next time link to the study! I would love to see articles on NEW treatments for depression. Spoiler alert..there really haven't been any for a long time now. Just me too drugs and this is a bit of a me too tech as well.
No sorry, this is silly. For one thing, because speeding up a treatment from taking 6 weeks to 5 days is still pretty huge. And also because what inevitably happens is:
> New experimental treatment with potential discovered
HN: "yawn, most of these never pan out, let me know when they have completed studies"
> New treatment study shows amazing results
HN: "Okay, but nobody can get it yet, right? It's gonna be years"
> New treatment widely available
HN: *crickets*
or
HN: "So what? It's not a NEW treatment, we've known about this for YEARS now"
No matter what, you have people dismissing some new thing, because either it's too new to know for sure whether it works, or it's not new enough to be interesting. Your comment is a perfect example of that, as it's new enough to where most people probably have never heard of this treatment, but you're already dismissing it as too old and boring.
TMS is a GREAT technology. More people should use it, and it should be considered first line treatment over meds. These machines should be in inpatient psych wards. TMS will inevitably help people. I'm not contesting any of that and this is a good thing.
HOWEVER - this is a small study and I'm willing to bet they didn't include people who had failed previous rounds of TMS (or maybe even people who had failed ECT) for a reason. Because it's still the same technology. I'm pretty sure that the remission rate for this will top off around 30%, perhaps a bit more, when more studies have been done and we're looking and real world treatment resistant patients, which is about what we see with TMS (and ketamine for that matter) already.
The point I'm trying to make is that treatment resistant depression is very common and debilitating. If someone is very treatment resistant, they will have tried TMS in the course of their treatment, as I did in 2012, when it was first released. I'm not sure how common this is but in my state Medicaid covers the cost of a course of TMS.
We need new treatment modalities, not because TMS or existing treatments are "boring or "old news", but because treatment resistant depression is a serious issue and we have very limited tools as of yet to help people who aren't responding to these end of the line treatments.
I'm also wary of how TMS is handled in clinics. It can be a bit cult like in some places (doctors overprescribing, overpromising, shrugging off side effects in populations that shouldn't be getting it like bipolar). The quote at the end of the article scares me too. I've noticed the more widespread and accepted a treatment becomes, the more stigmatized and impossible it is as a patient to get help. BUT WHAT PROZAC DIDN'T WORK FOR YOU?? BUT HUHH, CBT DIDN'T WORK FOR YOU?
15 years in, I still get doctors trying to get me back on an SSRI and try behavioralism on me. There are people who are very treatment resistant, and we need to understand this isn't a cure all. The more of a "fad" something becomes the more screwed you are in the medical system looking for help when it legitimately didn't work for you, even though we know even from this paper it's not a 100% remission rate. That's my perspective and lived experience that I'm trying to bring to this discussion.
TMS is great, and it's great it's being adopted more. But I'm wary of what that means for people who really need help and have failed TMS and other treatments and need and new modalities like me. I can hold both perspectives.
[citation needed]
A dear relative of mine has depression that medication has only sort of worked for, and they'd never even heard of this treatment before I just linked them to it. I think you're drastically overestimating how aware people are of more recent treatments. Not everyone is hyperconnected to new medical developments.
Plus, making a fairly effective treatment work in five days vs six weeks is still a huge deal. And that helps answers your question of, "Why is the media doing this with old depression treatments that have been around for ages?" Because it's not actually that old, a lot of people don't know about it, AND it's a big step forward for the practicality of that treatment.
I wouldn't consider your relative necessarily treatment resistant. I'm talking about those of us who have been left behind. In my case, that's 15+ plus of over 30 medication trials (following the STAR-D algorithm as well), failed bilateral ECT, TMS, ketamine IV, trigeminal nerve stimulation, and more. I'm on disability for the depression.
I'm not trying to invalidate your relative's situation but there are also people who have been stuck in the system for years like me and we need NEW OPTIONS. As I said, both things can be true. TMS being made faster is good, but we can't stop there, and that's my perspective on the article with someone with my lived experience. Not everyone knows someone this treatment resistant so I'm offering my unique experience about it. Your relative's experience and anyone who has tried a few meds or even hasn't and wants to try TMS is valid and I'm happy this exists. What I'm saying is that for the smaller population like me who has already been left behind this isn't going to help that much.
The most difficult thing about depression treatments is that most medications take 2-3 weeks to kick in and it's hard to get motivated to see the treatment through.
Chemically here's what worked for me:
1. Ketamine saved my life. It's the only thing I've encountered that provides instant relief. If you're in a particularly bad moment and buried by your thoughts, ask your psych to write you and Rx for Ketamine nose spray. It's much cheaper than intravenous Ketamine and highly effective by my experience. There's a pharma version of Ketamine on the market now (esketamine) but that require heavy doctor supervision and are also expensive. There are special pharmacies that synthesize the nose spray for you. The effect of those small, regulated doses of ketamine is like putting your brain in the sink and giving it a good wash. It helped me through some rough times. The best part about it is that it's non-addictive. Once I got through the deepest of my doldrums, I stopped filling the Rx.
2. Wellbutrin. It's the only pill that worked for me, with the fewest side effects. The only side effect is that my libido is now significantly higher (undesireable, for me).
Highly recommend if you're anxious about SSRIs
Wellbutrin's subtle stimulation has been so effective for the type of depression where you want to stay in bed and have no motivation to do even the basic things, which is how I felt before.
If you're reading this and depressed, you're not alone. It will get better, and you too will eagerly look forward to your days ahead.
I'm really glad Wellbutrin worked for you. When I tried it ~20 years ago (as a young teenager), it worked well for me for a few weeks and then absolutely did not work anymore. But that's the beauty/pain of SSRIs. There are a million of them and they impact each person differently.
The hardest part about finding the right meds is the patience/iteration/experimentation you need to finally land on the right thing and, knock on wood, I've finally found that stability.
I only connected the dots a few months back when looking into what Ketamine does. It's a miracle drug, I'm hoping my doctor will prescribe it to me but it looks like in my country you need to have been prescribed other anti-depressants and for them to have failed.
I have bipolar II, and usually suffer from depression. Unfortunately ketamine is not legally available for me.
I have benefited a lot from acetylcysteine.
As other people in the thread said, it may not be without side effects. The FDA has not approved it as a dietary supplement. Please do your due diligence.
"Our results therefore support a direct role for NAC in tumor initiation."
I was going to try NAC until I read that
Second: what are the negative impacts of alternative treatments?
Not clear what the level of impact is in humans and what the real trade-off is between better mental clarity when young/middle-aged vs. higher risk of cancer in old age. In the end we all die of something.
NAC is widely consumed, if it was a significant carcinogen you would think the effect would have been detected.
600mg, water-soluble, everyday before lunch.
> She says it felt like a woodpecker tapped on her skull every 15 seconds
> Then for 10 hours a day for five consecutive days, Emma sat in a chair while a magnetic field stimulated her brain.
All this sounds counterintuitive to me. For someone on the brink of a crisis daily, something that sounds like torture (a tap on your skill every 15 secs during 10 hours) helped her to feel relaxed at the end of the day.
What's taking a year? It doesn't sound like there is an additional study the FDA is waiting for results on.
Of course anecdotal and the effect might have been from the noise or vibration
I wonder what the cost will be. A friend of mine had regular TMS 30 minutes a day, five days a week for a month and the cost even with excellent insurance was well north of a thousand dollars. This is five times as much time in the machine.
> most people, if you believe those surveys that say most Americans would borrow money to pay for an unexpected $400 expense
This is idiotic. I would technically “borrow money” as well because I would likely put it on my credit card since that is by far the most convenient way to pay for things (and gives you the most protection as a consumer). I would just pay it off at the end of the month though.
Scroll to the bar chart. To pay for an unexpected $1k expense, 41% would pay from savings, 13% would reduce their spending on other things. I think we can agree that 41+13=54 which is "most" would thus pay without any form of borrowing. What's left that's not unknown: 16% would pay with a credit card, 14% would borrow from friends/family, and 7% would get a loan. The article adds all three sources up to hit 37% and create a headline: "Nearly 4 in 10 Americans would borrow".
>> [snip]And most of the Western world has healthcare where this would be covered for all citizens.
Well, let's be honest with ourselves here- if it's covered for all citizens, they probably wouldn't bat an eye at it whether it costs five figures or one.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketamine#Depression
> The approval of esketamine for TRD by the FDA was controversial due to limited and mixed evidence of efficacy and safety.
> In January 2020, esketamine was rejected by the National Health Service (NHS) of Great Britain.[41] The NHS questioned the benefits of the medication for depression and claimed that it was too expensive.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esketamine#Depression
It's too early, and it's for treatment resistant depression.
So yeah, unless you're a doctor/neurologist and know the protocol for validating drugs, it's not really worth listening to the pseudo science advocated by drug users who also encourage taking psilocybin/LSD/MDMA as a silver bullet, and constantly talk about pharma conspiracies. "Listen to the professionals" is a better advice.
0. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00213-014-3664-5
1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S01650...
But the experience taught me something, and I investigated and learned more. Sunlight regulates mood. Too much sunlight causes mania (which neatly explains the Florida Man phenomenon). I have cured my 25 year long depression with Sunlight and, when needed, sleep-deprivation (basically, I'd skip a night every once in while if I wasn't getting enough sun in my eyes), and I haven't felt clinical depression in over 7 years, and even through a few family tragedies during this period, my mood has not slipped once in just over 7 years.
The things done to the depressed by "modern" medicine is sometimes medieval. Electro-Convulsive Therapy should be illegal. It is the same thing as the scientist with the frog, cuts off one leg, still jumps, cuts off the other leg, frog is deaf. ECT isn't a valid treatment for anything at all. ECT fries the neurological system, obliterating neuronal myelin (which may take 20 years to return, and risks psychosis when it does for the return of a now unfamiliar internal monolog, racing thoughts and hearing voices. In all cases where a patient receives ECT, all cases with no exceptions, the patient will subsequently develop a pain disorder and are no longer able to recognize sarcasm, pinpointing some of the brain-damage ECT causes. Someone close to me was forced into ECT treatments by a quack psychiatrist. It murdered her, her body was still alive, but the person she was... was gone. 20 years later, when her wonderful personality only just started to return, she could no longer sleep because of being unaccustomed to the returning rush of internal thoughts, throwing her into a persistent depression due to going weeks and months without a decent night's sleep, until she took her own life.
I'd like to offer some advice to the depressed: stay away from psychiatrists, their only form of treatment is some pill that makes you feel worse. If you need prescriptions, see a Psychiatric Mental Health - Practical Nurse (PMH-NP). Psychologists also help, and they are harmless. Never ever submit to ECT, it won't help you, it just makes you more manageable to other people. If you can get off prescriptions, try getting more sunlight in your eyes every day it is possible, and if you don't get enough, skip a night's sleep, but never more than two in a row. If you experience mania, be very careful. Lithium, for all it's side-effects, rapidly brings stability, but it's effects wear off once levels drop too low. I'm not going to recommend anyone smoke pot, but it worked well enough for me as a stabilizer.
But of all the antidepressants tried over 25 years, nothing worked remotely as well as religiously getting as much bright sun in my eyes as I could.
Why not describe the treatment in the headline? Clicks, that's why.
One thing I often wonder: What happens when a depressed person forces themselves to do things that are associated with not being depressed? Workout, dopamine fasting, social interaction.
When I observe myself in depressed phases and people who suffer from worse forms of depression, usually they do not work out, do not spend empathic time with others and constantly dopamine binge (via eating or other forms of quick pleasure).
Would a change of behavior/lifestyle change the depression?
You don't want to exercise, see people nor wake up in the morning, and you feel terrible.
Winston Churchill used to paint while he's depressed. Its not a case of "they are hopeless" - they need to move and do something. And in the process, recognising what the triggers are and how to overcome it.
This is destructive rhetoric.
but you are absolutely, emphatically wrong.
Depression in many ways is consistent with "sickness behaviour". It is often a signal to get away from a stressor, just like sickness behaviour you have during flu is a signal that it's time to lay down and rest.
P.S. inb4, yes, there are other kinds of depression, like endogenous depression and such that are different in that regard (and treated differently too). none of the exceptions invalidate the most common scenario.
Lifestyle changes will help some depression, it will not help others. Generalizing from your own experiences is useful, but be very careful with how you present this to others.
Telling a chronically depressed person they just need to take a walk and eat some fruit is not just insulting, it's fodder for self-invalidating thoughts which can increase self-destructiveness.
And it’s hard to accept that your life style is “bad”. You can’t be you, basically, as if you were born untreatably ill. For me personally, these abnormal states turn on the rage against the nature, which in turn motivates to do workout in intricate ways sometimes, but it may not be the case for other people or for other activites. E.g. no way I’m going to look for a social interaction when depressed and/or anxious, that will only strengthen the negative effects.
It all ends up with a constant questioning why the life (in a sense of nature etc) is so fucked up and cannot exist in different forms than “normal”. You become an almost broken engine which it feels like requires a maintenance 24/7 and now this is your life. Yes, you can do that, but it is itself demotivating.
I fully agree with the triggers part though, and that can only be done through doing something.
It is absolutely different from “feeling down”.
It is a way of perceiving your reality and the world which no one can understand. And a supreme lack of energy.
Please please please do not put more strain on depressed people’s minds.
They would die for a MINUTE of “just calm”.
It's a buzzword to get the point across,
Say you feel the urge to play another round of a video game. You tell yourself "No, make a break". Now your brain replies "Ok, then let's eat some chocolate". You reply "No, let's not eat chocolate either". Now your brain replies "What? You said take a break from the GAME! Why not chocolate? Ok, then lets drink a coffee". Now you reply "We take a break from dopamine! No game, chocolate, coffee, beer etc! You understand?". Your brain "Damn. Ok. Grumble. Grumble.".
Then later in the day:
Your Brain: "I feel so good today. I wonder why?"
I believe you misunderstand how dopamine works.[1] What you're talking about is called self-discipline in English and has value but doesn't need pseudoscience to support it.
1. https://neuwritesd.org/2017/09/28/dopamine-is-not-your-brain...
"Dopamine fasting" is not a literal or scientific term, its not pseudoscientific either. It merely describes the process (perhaps incorrectly) of imposing some challenge to impulsive behaviours which is a perfectly acceptable way to help break these habitual behaviors, neurologically speaking that is perfectly sound, and consistent with scientific insight into this area. People often misunderstand and apply the overly simplistic "dopamine bad" mentality and think it's somehow about volume of dopamine which is laughably incorrrect for such a complex and nuanced process.
But critics can't see the woods for the trees with this one.
* If I don't eat sugar for a week, the next time I eat it, it tastes way better
* If I don't watch TV for a week, the next time I watch a good movie, it's way more enjoyable
* If I'm physically active for a week, the lazy day after that week of physical activity is more enjoyable
In my experience, a lot of things in life seem more enjoyable when moderated. The list can certainly be expanded.
No clue if this is official dopamine fasting, but that's what it makes me think of. And to be honest, I don't care what the science says on this*... my own personal experience is important enough for me to change the way I behave.
* unless it says it'll somehow lead to some horrible outcome down the road... then I'd consider it
If I get used to being physically active, the next day that I am NOT physically active I feel terrible.
On the other hand, if I have been lazy for a period, then one day I do a very brief exercise, even a 10-min moderate run, makes me feel excellent. However when I start doing those runs everyday, I don't feel that same good feeling.
How hard are you pushing it? Increase the difficulty/duration, and you may find a different outcome. I'm not talking pro-athlete level, but competitive high school athlete level (2-3 hours / day, 5-6 days / week, with some good lung heaving moments each day).
> On the other hand, if I have been lazy for a period, then one day I do a very brief exercise, even a 10-min moderate run, makes me feel excellent. However when I start doing those runs everyday, I don't feel that same good feeling.
I don't think this is the opposite. One is moderation of laziness, the other of physical activity. "If I'm lazy for a week, the day of exercise after that lazy week is more enjoyable".
it means that no, behavior change
could not do the the trick
I am not sure. It could also mean that the no change in behavior has been achieved.Or it could mean that the therapist didn't do a great job / didn't account for the individuality of the person
For many people with major depression, this isn't something you can just think your way out of or face your way out of. There are biochemical factors at play. Just like someone with diabetes can't exercise their way into a working pancreas, someone with major chronic, major depression can't just behavioral therapy their way into treatment.
Can behavioral therapy help? Absolutely. Is it going to be enough for people with hard to treat cases? Absolutely not.
Quite often I get told that my experience and what I have witnessed from my friends and family going through similar change of life situations, is that it's all anecdote.
We must simply wait until enough scientific studies that test "primal methods" such as dopamine management, exercise, etc, come out to support this theory.
Until then, trust the science and buy whatever new pill or method that will solve it.
As for me and my friends however, we have our cure, and we try to motivate others around us with mediocre success. (Who are you to question the ways of science? Dr says to take pills and I can keep eating my junk food..)
Dr says to take pills and I can maybe get shit together long enough to change my eating habit and regularly go see a therapist*
I understand that getting prescribed random medication has a bad reputation for good reasons, but it's still not a good idea to misrepresent those bad outliers as the average situation.
I would be careful about gloating about your success to those “pill-popping” “junk food eaters”… Even though it might feel great to get validation about your willpower or whatever.
However, in my experience, when you truly are clinically depressed, (1) you can't really force yourself to do anything good, and (2) even if you do something positive, you'll just get tired from trying to look like a functioning human being and may even feel worse.
In general, doing positive things do help, but only after you started medication and/or psychotherapy.
I know a personal trainer with depression. <shrug> No silver bullets. I'm inclined to see these things as symptoms, although (if I may borrow more PT lingo) maladaptive behaviour from unrecovered injuries is also a thing. Pretty much every physio will tell you that a pain in muscle X is caused by a deficiency in supporting muscle Y. It's just that we have zero insight into the mutual support structure (if any!) inside the brain.
Careful management of your social group and obligations can turn you from a depressed person who does nothing into a depressed person who does things. Sometimes that's good enough. But antidepressants can definitely do more.
A lot of the time the change in behavior is a coping mechanism rather than a cause for the depressive symptoms. They don't work out because they are so physically drained they can barely even muster up the energy to fulfill their responsibilities, or they become recluses because they believe their social connections aren't capable of supporting that level of vulnerability.
I suspect that it is more like the other way around, in that lifestyles incentivized in the developed world are rather poor at mitigating causes of depression, and by that I mean on a more fundamental, macro level instead of individual, which is why it has become so pervasive. For example, we have a fairly individualistic society, where many people have very shallow roots in their communities because of various causes of upheaval like immigration, education, employment. This makes it very difficult to get compassionate community support, which leaves mental healthcare workers to fulfill that position in a clinical manner.
More like, intentionally designed to cause mild reactive depression. You even have social media corporations openly admit to running psyops on their users.
depressed people probably spend more money on random bs trying to make themselves happier, or soothe their psychological pain.
First, that's borderline impossible to the point that it's an impractical and irrelevant suggestion. Second, for many, including myself, not much results but more stress and misery. Depression isn't one disease and is just a syndrome (a set of symptoms) caused by many different unrelated conditions and for many people those causes are entirely biological- not behavioral- and need to be treated like any other physical ailment. For some people (but not all), medication, therapy or other treatment can cause an improvement great enough for them to do be able to do those things and for some of those people (but not all) doing those things does help.
I wonder to what extent this mindset of viewing depression as purely biological is responsible for keeping people in depression by removing their sense of agency over it, as well as fostering dependence on drugs that at best result in temporary relief with a constant need for ever-increasing dosages as desensitization arises, and at worst can actually dramatically worsen one's mental condition (happened to a friend of mine recently who started experiencing depression since COVID lockdowns, was prescribed medication by a therapist, which seemed to be working at first until he started experiencing bipolar psychosis, and has now been switched to another medication and had to have the police called on him after multiple episodes of insanity, and is now on the verge of being sent to a mental hospital)
> Someone mentions lack of willpower and personal agency.
It's honestly incredible how people STILL try to argue that depressed people should "just get over with it", just stop being sad and stop being lazy. My god.
Excuse me, but you have fundamentally failed at understanding what depression even is and apparently conflate it with some rebel teenager phase during puberty by telling people to just get a grip on themselves.
Even the original commenter stated that for some, depression is purely biological, whereas for others, it may involve behavioral components. It's kind of ridiculous that anytime someone mentions personal agency in a depression thread, one gets heavily downvoted with hoards of commenters jumping in to say "depression is purely biological and only treatable through medication and therapy!" Ok, perhaps this is true for many depressed people, but what is the breakdown of depressed people who's depression is purely biological like this vs. those who's depression is also behavioral (I would guess the former being a small minority)? Why are we not allowed to acknowledge the latter? How does speaking to self-agency make anyone worse off?
Depression is complex. Let's not reduce it to something as simple as being a biological disease curable only via medication and therapy. In the past I would've said something along the same lines as my previous posts but excused myself out of the conversation earlier since I don't really have a horse in this race. But now that I have a close friend who's experiencing psychosis and basically lost his mind (eg. running around naked, talking to voices in his head) due to some psychiatrist prescribing him with the "wrong" depression medication, the issue has become personal to me. Apparently even the "experts" don't seem to know how to treat depression, so let's not speak so condescendingly and matter-of-factly as if anyone knows what they're talking about here.
That mindset is called a medical and scientific mindset[1]. You need to educate yourself before you hurt someone.
Your invitation to "educate yourself" seems condescending and unnecessary.
Good intentions or not.
It's easy for example to overlook trauma, and just blame ourselves "why can't we just be happy" or our brain's chemistry, while ignoring all the terrible things that happened to us, because it's too painful to relieve them.
Aren't treatments like this like reducing a person's fever by force (which they got because of a bacteria infection) while not fixing the underlying issue that caused it in the first place?
TL;DR: Instead of asking "What's wrong with you?" and making that part right by force, shouldn't we be asking "What happened to you?" and helping with that?
Medicinal treatments along with therapy can help.
Forcing yourself to do these things while depressed is really hard.
There are good 'catalyst' like Buproprine and SSRs
This person has been managing depression without drugs or counseling for decades. There are ups and there are downs. From the outside, it's not always possible to tell the difference until they drop the bombshell "I'm extremely depressed lately" (as in, not just today or yesterday, but continually for a week or more).
I think of it like this: inside my head is a brain, and that brain experiences the world a particular way. Let's call it a colour filter. Well, everyone has a different filter, based on genetics and formative years. For some people, their normal state is 'content', unless something pushes their mood above or below. For other people the normal state is "shitty: slightly worried about nothing in particular, a bit sick of everything, I just want to go to sleep", and they have to constantly struggle to push above that state into one that is more bearable.
Behavior is the result of the chemistry in your brain. You go out and socialize because it makes you feel good. Now what if you go out, socialize, and it makes you feel pain? Note, the pain itself does not have a physical cause, but that does not mean it is not real.
That's what difficult depression cases are like. Depression, like everything else, is a spectrum. The fact that one person can say "ah fuck it, I'll go out" and actually feels good does not mean that forcing a depressed person to go out is the cure for depression.
“Doing” things is literally impossible (well, torture is possible but unsustainable).
What you have seen is probably depressed people not managing well. Do not call it dopamine-bingeing because there is absolutely no intent there.
Depression is very very debilitating and it really messes up with your mind in unfatomable ways.
I’ve been in both sides of this question and, at least in my experience, its like wondering what happens when a tank of gas ignites itself. The activation energy just isn’t there. The thoughts are, but the spark isn’t.
I used to think this was just an analogy in my mind, but we’re an electrochemical beast and what does our brain actually *do* beyond selective catalysis.
Cause / effect. Are they depressed because they don't work or hang out, or do they not work / hang out because they're depressed? And there's bound to be other options as well.
I mean nothing personal, but your comment has energy of "thanks I'm cured"
- Situational: you force yourself to do things, you feel better and break out of the cycle
- Physical: you force yourself to do things, you don't feel anything but suffering. You don't get endorphins from exercise, you don't get serotonin from going to events and hanging out and achieving things. Depression is usually anhedonia which is a loss of feeling - whatever happens you're completely emotionless
Depression creates a feedback loop: not doing things makes you depressed, depression makes you not do things. So sometimes you are just lazy and need to start doing stuff. But sometimes it's a physical depression which caused you to stop doing things, and just doing things again won't make you not depressed. That's why I generally suggest starting and trying things, to see if they have any effect, but don't push it otherwise.
Not necessarily. There are physical changes when you exercize which also help with a physically-induced depression. The same is true for diet.
Just because it's psysical as opposed to situational doesn't mean it's just up to drugs and drugs alone to cure it.
I'm explicitly saying "it" [that is, forcing yourself to do things, like get in the sun, exercize, sleep less, better diet, etc.] does change something psysiologically, and does help, even in cases of non-situational depression.
The grandparent comment claimed that this helps only in cases of situational depression.
at times even things like morphine have been tried.
For me depressive periods manifest as borderline obsessive computer gaming. It's not the binging that triggers the depression. I continue functioning as an employee and family member but need something to lift the feeling of anxiety and sadness. It's very much like a pain killer. I don't suggest compulsive gaming for anyone as a remedy but for me it makes things tolerable. I've been also so depressed that I got therapy and antidepressants, and warmly recommend the approach - but you need to find a therapist you feel suitable.
Well, the problem is that depression causes a lack of motivation, and the lack of action or inability to do even normal chores continues to fuel the depression. (Depending on its severity it sometimes even impairs people from doing basic tasks like taking care of personal hygiene - there are cases where indiviuals don't brush their teeth or even bathe for weeks; e.g. https://web.archive.org/web/20120305002714/http://damnihateb... ). So to us "normal" individuals these people may look lazy or those that lack discipline, but it's actualy the disease impairing them.
As you guessed though, taking actions is indeed one of the behavioural techniques of Behaviour Therapy or Cognitive Therapy to tackle depression. It does work, and depressed individuals do cite an improvement in their mood when they do some task (especially stuff they have been procrastinating).
But if you consider the cognitive model of depression (i.e. the common thinking patterns of depressed individual), one other aspect of depression is that they don't feel satisfaction or a feeling of accomplishment in doing such tasks. And thus, any mood improvment is only temporary. Which again makes them feel helpless and they regress. Thus, cognitive therapy focuses on not only encouraging behavioural actions, but also working on correcting thought patterns that devalue such actions.
("Perfectionism" is one example of such thought pattern - if something is not "perfect", the individual often devalues the whole work done. Using the same examples you cited, even if you get this kind of individual to do a workout, as soon as s/he misses a workout, they will immediately start to blame themslelves for not being able to "maintain" discipline to the point of becoming dysfunctional..
It can, sure. But as many other commenters have pointed out, depression isn't just one thing. And for many individuals who suffer from major depression, it isn't situational at all, so doing all those things (assuming you can do them), doesn't really change anything at all. Because of what has happened in the world over the last 21 months, it's harder and harder to separate a chronic, deep depression from the situational depression that many people have found themselves in. I've suffered from depression my entire life (I self-diagnosed at age nine but had symptoms going back to at least age six), and even I'm unsure if the depression I'm experiencing now is more situational or more biochemical, just because everything in the world has been such a mess.
I can tell you that for people with deep depression, there is only so much fronting and working-out and socializing a person can do before the energy required to do those things and put on a front, of "acting" OK becomes too much. And that can often explode in a fit of rage/sadness/sorrow, because believe it or not, most depressed people don't want to be depressed and don't want anyone else to know they are depressed.
I can also tell you that there are people who are so depressed they literally cannot get out of bed to take a shower, let along go for a run. They cannot move, not out of laziness, but because the act of physically moving is too mentally and physically taxing and painful. They literally cannot do any of the things that give them any sort of dopamine binge. They don't eat. I was an incredibly active high school athlete (cheerleading and gymnastics) before I fell into my first "can't-get-out-of-bed"/"can't function" period of depression as a 16 year old. I was lucky I had my parents (especially my mom), because she was tireless at finding me the right psychiatrist (six in an 18 month period) and keeping notes of the side-effects of the different medications I kept trying (over 15 before we found a combo that worked at the time and probably that many have been tried since as I've gotten older and my body and biochemistry and hormones have changed), not to mention handling the insurance, taking me to doctor appointments, making sure I could eat. I had to handle more of it myself when I had another major depressive episode in college -- my mom still helped but I didn't live with her anymore and was no longer a minor, whose health she could take an active role in without signing forms that we didn't want to sign. And I had to handle it completely on my own when it happened in my early 30s, and I still had to work and had to expel every ounce of energy I had into getting a job done until I could get the right medication to help me out of it just enough to continue existing.
Trust me, if it was as easy as just forcing yourself into doing things that don't make you depressed, you'd have a whole lot less suicidal people. And you wouldn't have as much excitement around rTMS and Ketamine and other therapies that are starting to show real promise.
Which was discussed on here a fair bit a couple days f weeks back…
At one point I was working out 4 days a week, was absolutely ripped, and salsa dancing multiple nights a week; but I was still depressed.
It really depends on what kind of depression you have, often it’s a consequence of something else (in my case, probably an anxiety disorder and a genuine difficulty forming lasting social bonds).
Yes. Clearly I disagree with others here.
The problem is that it's a vicious circle so it's difficult to change your behavior/lifestyle. But if you can, maybe with external help, it surely helps except maybe in very hard cases.
By the way, I'm not sure the term clinical is being used correctly in other comments. Could someone with relevant knowledge confirm?
The worst obstacle to break the circle are negative thoughts, that hide where the exits from the labyrinth are.
All of this takes a supreme level of effort, it never felt natural to me. Never got a "jogger's high". I was just depressed while my feet are moving. After spending time with friends I am emotionally drained and need to recharge. When I have a serious bout of depression, it's difficult to leave the bedroom / house for days or weeks at a time (at its worst). My entire body feels like I've been tumbled down a hill in a barrel.
In this time I've had a half dozen suicide attempts, two of them requiring medical attention. I still think of myself as a worthless waste of space. Every day when I wake up part of my routine is to shake off the suicidal ideation just to get started for the day.
CBT has helped to deal with the logical / behavioural impacts of this. I don't get as mad or frustrated at myself and am better equipped to recognise triggers and pull myself back from the edge.
I think if I had been able to get help when I was a child (I first started self-harming at age 7), perhaps being happy and motivated would feel more natural.
But no, even forcing a lifestyle change and doing all the things you said have no lasting effect. I doubt it will ever feel natural for me to wake up, go for a run, meet a friend before work for coffee, enjoy meetings with clients, etc.
Definitely still do those activities, otherwise things snowball. But the problem is a literal chemical / hormone imbalance in my brain that affects everything from when, how often and how long I sleep, and how much lethargy I have throughout the day.
A lot of people struggling with depression have had a lifetime of advice similar to what you suggested. Well-meaning family think it's as simple as just getting moving, and they think the symptoms are the problem, and we have a lifetime of being told to stop being lazy, stop feeling sorry for ourselves, etc, which is the main "stigma" of depression and the reason why these types of well-meaning posts usually result in less than positive responses from long-term chronic depression sufferers.
Edit to add - everyone's root causes are not the same, so while I have decent stretches where I can push myself to exercise and face the day, other people can't and there are times where I can't summon the energy and it's difficult to move. Also inb4 try changing your diet, have you tried meditation, read this <insert famous author>, etc. Living like this sucks and I've read and tried many things to ease the pain. Improvements are slow, incremental, hard-won, and often temporary / good until the next downer hits.
[Note: I am not a doctor, but I lived with people with depression]
Apparently, in the case of true clinical depression (i.e. not just "feeling down"), not much. The typical reaction is "yeah, whatever", and they do it for as long as you want them to do it because they don't feel like resisting.
A change of behavior/lifestyle can certainly help, in the same way that lifestyle changes can help with many other diseases, but forcing depressive people to do what non-depressive people do looks just as effective as forcing people with broken legs to walk.
It also looks like there is more than one form of depressions. But the way I see it, depressive people are not sad, they are emotionless. Nothing brings them joy, but nothing saddens them either. I didn't even notice any "binge" behavior, they are just as likely to gain or lose weight, because who cares about eating. Depression is not grieving.
Statistically, sure. Individually it might not work and uncertainty makes something hard even harder.
I've actually maintained a pretty healthy schedule, with regular swimming, intense hatha-yoga (more like gymnastics), spend a fair amount of time with people. At some point I've also became a workaholic.
How I felt — pretty horrible, all those nice things (unhealthy attitude to work is not nice, of course) barely helped to maintain a thin veneer of my social persona. Basically, most of the people who interacted with me would not know that I'm depressed. I think there are a lot of people like that, just outer shells.
I did not get medical help either in the form of therapy or drugs.
In the hindsight, I think that depression could have been helped at least a bit by going to the good therapist. I had some issues with rage a couple years later, and going to psychoanalyst really helped me a lot. Oh, you know what also helped a lot? It may sound stupid, but at some point I've started going to piano lessons and it really was beneficial somehow.
It is unfortunate that the term "depression" is used frequently for things that are not really depression.
I highly recommend this lecture by Stanford's Sapolsky On Depression to understand the difference. He will do so far more articulatly than I ever could.
As a person intimately familiar with depression as it has been with me for decades and it is still deeply inside of me the answer to your question is “No”.
Depression is hell. It sits inside you. You cannot run from it, you cannot hide from it. Whatever you do it is still inside you and it does not let up and it tortures you continuously.
It does -not- improve by going for a walk. It does not go away with social interaction. It does not go away by not eating.
It turns the entire world bleak.
I have to time my interaction with other people carefully, so I won’t start screaming before I am alone again.
Asking a depressed person to “go for a walk”, “exercise” and things will be better is absurd. It Is like asking person in a wheel chair to get up and go for a run,
It is also the standard reaction from people once they hear “you are depressed”. They have no idea whatsoever what they are talking about, and I wish people would just stop it. Don’t you think if it was that f…ing simple I would have done it a long time ago.
I feel a deep need to scream at a person who suggests it, but you can’t do that in this society.
If I could put a finger on them and let them experience what is inside me for a moment they would be the one running away screaming.
I recently talked with my partner about this, and annecdotaly, one friend had bad enough depressive episodes, they got an antidepressants prescription. Later they complained that it really helped with the downs of the depression, but in general it felt stifling and kind of muffled the highs in life previously accessible.
But, fortunately, the medication helped enough that they started and stuck to an exercise regime and then managed to phase out the medication.
I think with mental health in general, everything comes with a great deal of your-mileage-may-vary.