All of these things are adequately accounted for in my previous post except one which I find laughable every time I hear it, and provides sufficient evidence to me that you are an ideologue not concerned with realistic representations of history or current political events.

>Israeli apartheid state

Apartheid states do not let the oppressed class have massive representation in their representative government at all levels.

They do not have members of the oppressed class sit on the bench of the highest court in the land.

They do not mandate, at a federal level, that ALL state enterprise MUST have a member of the oppressed class on their board of directors.

They do not consistently have individuals from the oppressed class as cabinet members.

They do not have ambassadors belonging to the oppressed class.

They do not have members of the oppressed class as some of the highest ranking generals in their military, or as commanders of, hilariously, the border police.

Members of the oppressed class in apartheid states do not have the highest standard of living and quality of life compared to members of the same religious and ethnic groups in the region.

Apartheid states do not bend over backwards to accommodate, preserve, and enable the cultural and religious practices of the oppressed class, even when its members openly call for the genocide of the predominant ethnic group in the locale, refuse to participate in coalition governments, and reinforce sectarian, segregationist cultural policies and beliefs.

If you sincerely think Israel is an apartheid state, you are woefully uninformed, and a fool that has fallen for blatant propaganda.