> tf.nn.conv2d(input, filters, strides, padding, data_format='NHWC', dilations=None, name=None)
> torch.nn.functional.conv2d(input, weight, bias=None, stride=1, padding=0, dilation=1, groups=1)
> tf.nn.conv2d(input, filters, strides, padding, data_format='NHWC', dilations=None, name=None)
> torch.nn.functional.conv2d(input, weight, bias=None, stride=1, padding=0, dilation=1, groups=1)
Have you checked out Google's Coral devices? DL has definitely been abused for marketing purposes, but I think the lack of delivery had more to do with the fact that DL was progressing far faster than the tools around them which make their intelligence actionable.
Part of this is because so many DL applications had to be delivered in a SaaS way, when local AI makes much more sense for a lot of applications. I think the TF -> TFLite -> Coral Device pipeline has the potential to revolutionize a LOT of industries.
I have done the tutorials and they all work. They seem to be very well maintained.
People I know said they never got the google Coral SDK working. Unfortunately they wouldn't give me their Corals. :(
Kind of offtopic but yeah, same. I'm a data scientist and right now I'm learning Django.
I don't get your point about JS developers not enjoying the fruits of these labors - they don't need to enjoy them because they work in a different domain. And if they're interested in playing around with deep learning, the higher level APIs are easy to pick up. I'm not sure what you're expecting to see.
I do feel like Google could do better communicating all of their different tools though. Their ecosystem is large and pretty confusing - they've got so many projects going on at once that it always seems like everyone gets fed up with them before they take a second pass and make them more friendly to newcomers.
Facebook seems to have taken a much more focused approach as you can see with PyTorch Live
Pretty cool imo