Becoming a Religion of the Book: Scripture Before the Bible
laphamsquarterly.org
laphamsquarterly.org
Yes, in the time of Jesus the Torah was stored as scrolls not a single book - the compilation of the Torah into a book is post Christian Era. This surprised exactly no one.
That Judaism is a cultic religion with ritual elements and pslams being sung during processions and temple services is an utterly unfascinating and banal observation that anyone who is undergrad level familiar with biblical studies would know. Or even someone who just reads some of the OT as an adult.
I see this a lot with the 'ashera as a consort of yaweh' hay making efforts so many engage in - this is all spelled out in the Bible if you bother to read it. Yes, many people in Palestine and broader Israel practiced synthetic versions of Yaweism or whatever you want to call it.
Why do we always approach the Bible from a post WW2 western low church ('billy graham') perspective?
I'm also not sure why a passage from Nehemia describing Ezra, who both lived in the 5th century BC, has to be from the 2nd or 3rd century BC.
And I'm not even sure about the dichotomy of a religion of the book and a cult of sacrifice; many of those sacrifices are described in the book, after all.
So the Torah itself could be seen as the Third Temple, or the true First Temple rebuilt, manifested in a form that could never be torn down, stone by stone, ever again? A form that could ever be with the Jews in their trials and travels over the Centuries, carried and copied and taught. A poetic thought…
What ruins the poetry is that the Temple was for making sacrifices to God as commanded in the law. The Torah itself is demonstrably unable to facilitate this sacrifice making the poetic comparison quite weak.