Hacker News Reader

Comment by ndsipa_pomu | Hacker News Reader

I don't understand how that would work. If the UK passes a law stating that TV license payers are allowed to watch BBC programmes (e.g. iPlayer) in say, Belgium, then if a rights owner prosecutes the BBC for breach of contract (in Belgium) how would UK law be applicable?

View on HN

Exactly, BBC would need publishing rights in all countries the viewers would wish to watch it in. Unless they changed all there existing agreements with rights holders to not be constrained by territories, which they aren't going to do, or at least only for a lot of money (and even then they might not be able to if the rights are already granted exclusively to someone else).

I don't think that's how it works. It can be distributed in UK following UK laws yet accessed from some other place. If i borrow a DVD from my local library and travel abroad with it, my library is not infringing on anything and neither am i.

That's not how it works. IP addresses were never a location information to begin with. Many people in your country have a "foreign" IP, and many people from other countries have IPs from your country: yes that's how the Internet works. IPs are technical identifiers, not ID cards. Due to this, it was already pointed out over a decade ago that public services blocking certain IP ranges led to terrible inequalities: for example there is (or at least used to be not long ago) many public services French citizens residing in the French colonies (DOM/TOM) could not access despite paying taxes and officially residing on French territory. The same is true with some ISPs (eg. mobile operators) who use "foreign" IP ranges with dynamic IPs: you can be physically in metropolitan France yet be denied access to certain services.

As the VPN market has shown, filtering by IP address does not filter by country and therefore does not fulfill a contractual obligation for limited distribution. Whoever claims otherwise is misinformed or deliberately lying.

Also, very important note: unless the BBC has established offices/activities in Belgium, there's nothing to be sued about. As a british organization abiding by british laws, they couldn't care less what the Brussels copyright mafia has to say in belgian courts. The only exception to this i can think of is when the US copyright mafia gets involved and they will bribe (see The Pirate Bay trials) and push for foreign arrests (see Kim Dotcom arrest) because US government is subservient to their interests.

Now for my personal opinion: fuck copyright, fuck "rightholders", fuck the police and fuck the mafia. Just abolish money and private property: we have enough resources for everyone to live decently if we don't concentrate them in the hands of wealthy fuckers who'd like us all to suffer for their greed. Let the people who want to create art do so, and let the people who want to enjoy it do that too.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com