Crows are self-aware just like us, says new study (2020)
bigthink.com
bigthink.com
The crows were trained to watch for a flash — which didn’t always appear — and then peck at a red or blue target to register whether or not a flash of light was seen. Ozzie and Glenn were also taught to understand a changing “rule key” that specified whether red or blue signified the presence of a flash with the other color signifying that no flash occurred.
In each round of a test, after a flash did or didn’t appear, the crows were presented a rule key describing the current meaning of the red and blue targets, after which they pecked their response.
This sequence prevented the crows from simply rehearsing their response on auto-pilot, so to speak. In each test, they had to take the entire process from the top, seeing a flash or no flash, and then figuring out which target to peck.
Not sure I'd say this means 'self aware' but it does seem smart, as in evidence of problem solving rather than just conditioning
Also many animals can problem-solve up to a point, even use tools, but that is not what "self aware" means to me. Self-awareness is more being able to think of yourself in the abstract, behave in consideration of how others may see you, etc.
This is why the study of consciousness is so difficult. We each clearly know that we are having a subjective experience, but we have no way of knowing that any one (or anything) else is.
I kind of sympathize with the hypothesis that simply all matter has some degree of self consciousness.
(Though I suppose there's another way we could interpret look at that phenomenon ...)
I'm here all week - I think.
Causal understanding of water displacement by a crow: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZerUbHmuY04
Nagel [1] says, "* But no matter how the form may vary, the fact that an organism has conscious experience at all means, basically, that there is something it is like to be that organism."
Definitely read the whole article.
So when we're asking if corvids are self-aware, we can't help really* asking if their experience of self-awareness is the same as ours. And we cannot know that, as Nagel so elaborately demonstrates.
Consciousness (and intelligence) are not binary on/off choices. They're points in a multi-dimensional space.
[1] https://www.sas.upenn.edu/~cavitch/pdf-library/Nagel_Bat.pdf
By Temple Grandin, Ph.D. Department of Animal Science Colorado State University
Some pointed jokes about how the sort of people who work in tech tend to be autistic, like her.
It's clear we can classify stimuli, and responses, in various ways: internal/external, autonomous/conscious, selfish/altruistic, fast/slow. So I don't think it's strange researches want to understand the notion of self-awareness. Whatever that might turn out to be biologically. The problem is it's way out there on the emergent system spectrum, so really difficult to pin-point.
In short, there doesn't have to be anything magic about us putting names on classes of responses. We already know we are self-aware, by unknown definition.