I found it to be very interesting from a statistical perspective. The language used does feel outdated, but I quite liked having a real world (tongue in cheek) example to make the math relatable.

Removing the genders (perhaps using the second person 'you'), and using 'partner' instead of wife may be the modern way, and would probably be just as relatable and compelling, while also being inclusive.

I'm wondering what negative effect this article could have for women in tech though?

My partner, a woman in tech, frequently tells me there is one type of person she feels holds her back professionally. It's the type of person that treats her like she is weak and needs to be coddled and protected from anything that could be perceived as threatening. I certainly don't have any real idea on what effect this article or your comment has, but I do think women are plenty capable of not only handling, but maybe even enjoying this article.

OK, suppose it gets flagged on HN and is removed. The article would still exist on the parent site and would (supposedly) keep harming women in tech. What then? Remove it from search results? Or even better, make it a crime to write wrongthink of this sort?