? baby lawyer and former dev here: don't we have that anyways? E.g. on Casetext, Lexis, all the usual legal research sites.
I personally haven't encountered a situation where it was totally lacking.
I personally haven't encountered a situation where it was totally lacking.
I’m not sure there’s an alternative: if a reference to an other text is complete (and thus fully disambiguated) it’s reasonably easy to infer it, but if it’s only partial and thus ambiguous (e.g. Article 54) then it becomes a lot more problematic: what happens legally if the system misinterprets the reference (e.g. to the current law’s article 54 but nearby contextual clues made it clear that it was some other text’s) and the reader follows this misinterpretation?