Of course there is corruption, of course some are above the law (but then is true the world over), and you need to play by the local rules, but that is not an absence of protection, although it may not be on par with what you might expect somewhere else.
You also have to remember that the justification for the Russian invasion of Crimea was to protect the minority Russian population living in Crimea. So clearly the idea that the Russian government protects Russians is believed to be true within the state of Russia to the point where that idea can be exploited to justify military expansionism.
We really need to get past the 'good guy' / 'bad guy' version of politics, the whole world is a shade of grey.
[0] https://www.statista.com/topics/5509/crime-in-russia/#dossie...
[0] https://nypost.com/2021/02/08/man-arrested-for-offensive-sir...
[1] https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/euro-2020-arrest...
[2] https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/arrests-for-offensive-...
I'm not sure what you mean here, I assume you are referring to fines, as the UK doesn't have a paid bond, a fine is not a fee, it is a punishment. Fines are also a punishment in Russia so the idea should not be entirely alien to you. Here is a link that details the Russian Federations punishments for financial crimes, lost of fines in that area of Russian law [0].
Like I said in my original post, you have to abide by the local rules. The Russian government viewing a like as a prohibited political speech and the associated punishment would be following the local rules.
[0] https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/w-019-7324?transi...
[Citation needed]
The only justification was to get votes in future president elections. We call this phenomenon "Crimea consensus".
Current Crimea population have no access to online financial instruments (including totally Russian banking systems) and this summer was a huge crisis with drinkable water. Russian government did nothing.
You known nothing Ransom Stark.
That is not a justification. It might have been the reason for the expansion, but it wasn't the justification. You might have some better Russian sources but here is an annotated speech by Putin on the subject of Crimea [0].
Why didn't you say that the crisis was created by spiteful Ukraine resenting that Crimean people are mostly pro-Russian?
Has Ukraine recognized that Crimeans are Russian citizens or is it punishing people that it still considers Ukrainian citizens?
"Russian government did nothing."
[Citation needed]