> Apple can maintain its App Store payment monopoly while the case proceeds
Literally both judges said it was NOT a monopoly, and the ruling is not "apple must stop being a monopoly" (which is the only way that sub-headline makes sense).
Is this a kind of "manifest destiny" kind of thing, where they are trying to will it into existence?
Judges and many influentials in the Justice system repeatedly give almost no punishments to white collar crime. Yet the same people many times say justice is being served in the country.
A more direct example: Courts still rule that gerrymandering for the purpose of screwing over the other party is allowed. Of course wink wink they say it isn’t allowed. However some basic obvious lying is all that’s required to allow this.
It’s still politically motivated and undemocratic gerrymandering/voter suppression. Regardless of what judges or the Justice system says.
Laws and the Justice system are just that. They aren’t beacons of principle or morality.