Hacker News Reader

Comment by agustif | Hacker News Reader

No but he peddled brexit and then moved production to singapore... You might default to not trusting a guy who does that...

View on HN

and then was given a ventilator contract, with fanfare, at the start of the pandemic when there was a shortage, (whilst the government wasn't answering the phone from actual ventilator manufacturers) then they couldn't deliver.

I will never by a dyson product.

I have a DC-62 vacuum cleaner and its a hell to empty. Batteries are short-lived and expensive.

Their hand dryers are perfect microbe an virus spreading tools, apparently.

Their kind of "airco" ventilators do not cool the air.

So yes, Dyson is a failed brand.

I don't think this is entirely fair. Separating the man from the brand, the products are pretty good. My dyson vacuum is excellent, even with a dog. My wife has the hairdryer which she loves.

He did advocate for Brexit and then move production offshore though. So take the rough with the smooth.

Agreed. I remember reading his autobiography back in 2005 or so, and thinking what a weird self-centred individual he was. I certainly don't agree with his politics.

However, I think there's no doubt that Dyson make great vacuum cleaners.

He's a bit strange, from my eyes anyway. He's done some great things for UK innovation and product design. Politics aside, we shouldn't detract from that.

But my wife can dry her hair in less than 20 minutes, and it's quiet. Well worth the money!

How is it hard to empty? The bottom just flips open. And there are lots of battery options- 3rd party ones aren't expensive.

Flipping it open and clapping it back is takes quite some effort. Because of that some trash falls outside the bin.

I don't know about their cordless stuff but aren't their corded vacuums considered the best? We got a one of their orange "ball" vacuums in 2009 as a wedding gift, it's been used 300+ days per year for the past 12 years. I had change out the power switch in 2019 -- it was only $9 on Amazon + a 15 minute procedure I learned from a YouTube video. When this thing eventually dies I'm pretty sure I'm buying another one.

> I don't know about their cordless stuff but aren't their corded vacuums considered the best?

Not really. They're not bad, but they're very expensive. You can get something comparable (Shark) for cheaper, or something better (Miele) for the same money.

And Dyson has said that they're not making any new corded vacuums, they're focusing on cordless now.

Even before that, as reported in the news in 2011 he stealthily built a swimming pool in the basement of his listed mansion without planning permission.

He obviously knew what he was doing and it worked since, although he was later caught, he managed to escape prosecution and was granted retrospective permission... I'm not sure authorities would have been that understanding with everyone.

I didn't know that Dyson actually peddled Brexit. That is a massive disappointment on such a brilliant person. (I'd love to read more if you have references)

It's all out in the open, he pushed for Brexit[0] citing British competetivity ... and then moved production out of Britain to Singapore.

Got any references for 'briliant person'‽

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Dyson#Pro-Brexit

It was widely reported in the press at the time a quick Google will provide a lot of results.

given his experience with EU energy labelling laws his position really isn't that unreasonable

(essentially the laws were bought and paid for by his competitors)

and they were annulled: https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/201...

Well, so he claims. Is that actually true? But regardless; even if he had reason to dislike certain regulators - that makes for a really poor reason to argue to remove yourself from the equation when it comes to influence over those regulations. If anything, if indeed the rule-making process was corrupt, that argues against Brexit, not for it (from the perspective of business primarily involved in selling goods affected by those regulations).

In fact, it sounds like those regulations hurt his competitors at least as much as Dyson: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/aug/21/anger-as-eu-ba... - "Dyson vacuum cleaners score highly in the ratings. However, the manufacturer has many concerns about flaws in the system that will ultimately be unhelpful for consumers."

Notably, Dyson "won" in that review; it only lost the case for hundreds of millions in damages.

> that makes for a really poor reason to argue to remove yourself from the equation when it comes to influence over those regulations.

here's a few Dyson subsidiaries:

   - Dyson BV (Dutch)
   - Dyson Austria GmbH
   - Dyson GmbH (German)
   - Dyson Finland Oy
   - Dyson Ireland Ltd
   - Dyson SAS (France)
   - Dyson Spain SLU
   - Dyson Sweden AB
   - Dyson sp zoo Poland

it's a large multinational, not some micro-enterprise, brexit has little to no impact on his ability to "influence" regulations

Of course it does - as a well known British business, it'll get the kind of attention and care from its home turf it won't elsewhere in the form of some small subsidiary. And the guy isn't exactly known for being timid or restrained; he's tried to litigate his grievances in via the press repeatedly - and that's going to be less effective moving forward. Even if he gets a hearing in the continental press (which I kind of doubt, because why would the public care?), he and his business are likely to be defined by his brexiteer stance - not exactly a great way to sway opinion his way. (And just to be sure to undermine his British support, he decided to move to Singapore too... I guess that's his own little Brexit?)

Most other sane business tried to stay away from this whole minefield at least in public, and that sure looks like the better call in retrospect.

the EU is not China

those subsidiaries are EU companies: they have the same right to market access and to be treated in the same way under EU law as those of Bosch or Miele

and they're capable of suing if they're treated differently

the fact the CEO of the parent company thinks the EU is shit doesn't change this

Politics isn't some formulistic emotionless process; having access to supportive media, which in turn influence public opinion and pressure politicians, who in turn are not entirely free from bias and have agency to pick and choose which priorities they will address most quickly - that kind of stuff matters. Companies try to have great PR even when it doesn't directly influence sales because of this. Additionally, companies spend quite a bit on lobbying. Influence matters, and being a home-grown darling is likely to grant much more of it than being a fairly faceless corporation that's likely not remembered much (and if it is, remembered for negative things).

Regulations are never perfect - and Dyson's own cases clearly show that. But being able to nudge their evolution such that flaws don't hurt you specifically too much is valuable, even if it's not any kind of enforceable right.

Also, while I have a great deal of respect for the value of the EU, no organization is entirely free from regulatory capture (or effects like it). That's not some kind of anti-EU rant; I'm entirely willing to accept that the EU is probably on the healthier end of the spectrum here. But just because they're no worse than others doesn't mean lobbying isn't a thing.

> essentially the laws were bought and paid for by his competitors

Citation Needed.

Why Singapore out of all places? It seems a very expensive place to start a manufacturing company.

They're mostly not manufactured in Singapore. They're designed in Singapore (formerly the UK), manufactured mostly in Malaysia and the Philipines (where labour is cheaper, [1]) and I presume the shift is entirely for tax reasons – in contrast to the UK it has far lower corporate taxation rates, and relevantly for Dyson himself, no capital gains tax at all [2] unlike the UK, which I presume will dramatically improve his income. The fact that they'll be in / closer to the same timezone as the manufacturing base probably helps as well.

[1] https://www.quora.com/Where-and-how-are-Dyson-vacuums-made?s... [2] https://ebos-sg.com/singapore-is-a-tax-haven/

Reply on news.ycombinator.com