If you're using a regulated exchange, just go and buy Apple shares or use a bank instead. It really is almost completely pointless.
If you're using a regulated exchange, just go and buy Apple shares or use a bank instead. It really is almost completely pointless.
The whole point of Google, to some people at Google, might have been "don't be evil" at one point in time. Decentralisation was the whole point of the WWW.
Different people have different goals. Largely, it's just about making money.
Whether one of those properties is "freedom from regulation" is yet to be seen. I personally quite doubt it.
I agree that decentralisation is the whole point of the WWW and I use it in that manner, I think people who spend all of their time on one or two centralised platforms are bizarre.
I think you are missing the point. The rhetorical does not dictate what will actually happen. Crypto is a step ahead of regulators, in much the same way that uber was ahead of regulators. That allowed uber to blast through a global complex of taxi regulations. Crypto has/is similarly able to innovate outside of a handful of institutions.
That does not mean that it's unregulatable. Also, if both regulated and unregulated options exist... there's no reason to think that the unregulated one wins.
It feels more like a union of those shunned by the current establishment, trying to get a piece of the money pie.