Google hasn't changed their EULA for the spanish version and i wonder if this has happened for the many other supported languages.
Google hasn't changed their EULA for the spanish version and i wonder if this has happened for the many other supported languages.
That infamous EULA was intented for other Google services, and was mistakenly used for the browser. Supposedly (I haven't actually read it) it was already changed/clarified.
So if i build google chrome by myself without any changes whatsoever and use the product of my build do i unbind myself from the EULA?
It's the binary that was (and as you noted, is) distributed under that unfortunate EULA. For me it is really clear that they did not intend to have such an EULA, with the BSD licensed code, it REALLY makes no sense.
BTW, a somewhat similar issue struck Firefox too: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_software_rebranding
A trademark/branding issue resulted in Debian Linux having a browser called Iceweasel instead of Firefox, built from the same sources.
But what you say is true, my level of hate is misplaced. I've been reading about that and i made a very wrong judgment.