He didn't mention any of these failed wargames in the podcast. Reading about it now gives a lot more context on why the commander in chief of the US Navy at Pearl Harbor knew his head was going to roll following the Japanese attack.
He didn't mention any of these failed wargames in the podcast. Reading about it now gives a lot more context on why the commander in chief of the US Navy at Pearl Harbor knew his head was going to roll following the Japanese attack.
Quite a few times I've been mesmerized by his podcasts only to find out later its either mostly made up or a "classic" but totally discredited version of the story.
He really doesn't bother reading up on the latest and most accurate material for his topics.
It's the main reason why I stopped listening to him (the smaller one is that I will never get used to his grating accent).
I read https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/1ppmsm/thoug...
However, never take the book he's actually using...most of the time it's plain outdated.
As you say, you can't really blame a guy who says 5 times per episode that he's "not a historian", but plenty of times I just can't help and wonder why didn't he spend 30 minutes extra researching a topic and choosing better material and sources. The only answer I got is that bad material makes for better stories.
OMG, did I never realize how terrifying war in the Pacific was.
http://feeds.feedburner.com/dancarlin/history?format=xml
"Supernova in the East" is his latest series.