Rust might be great (I don't know) but this aspect of the community makes me less likely to try the language, not more.
Rust might be great (I don't know) but this aspect of the community makes me less likely to try the language, not more.
We’ve had basically no alternative other than C, with a lot of failed attempts at half supported C++. A lot of us suffered the horrible experience of working with severely lacking C++ compilers in the embedded space. Unless you were working with ARM or on top of linux, C++ was a bad idea.
Pretty much until ARM, support was terrible.
( I didn't care a bit about this aspect when I approached Rust )
How so?
You need to invest a lot more to use the tool well, but then the tool can do a lot more.
> but then the tool can do a lot more
Can it? How do you measure that Rust/C++ do more than JS/TS given that they're used to solve completely different problems?
That's a whole paradigm shift from using languages that are only fit for a given application domain.