Color Vision Simulation
developer.mozilla.org
developer.mozilla.org
The original image and the Protanopia image are exactly the same to me.
The Deuteranopi looks very slightly different -- if I really stare at it. The other do indeed look different.
I definitely have trouble with many shades of some colors, especially if the colors are really small on the screen.
So many Protanopia colorblind filters in games and apps mess up the colors way too much for me, and look worse and less visible than the non-colorblind normal color settings. Definitely interesting to hear about other colorblind users' accessibility issues.
There are so many degrees of colorblindness that accessibility is difficult to cover for all of us. I hope Mozilla and other developers are accounting for common colorblindness and testing with real colorblind people.
I also can't use the red-green colormodes in slack, iOS, mac, etc. because it makes the colors too... weird.
I often wonder if it's because the colors that I see, grew up with and label as "red" and "green" are actually different to what other people see as "red" and "green". But since we all just use these words to describe color, I would never know if the world that I see is similar to what everyone else sees.
Maybe the colorfilters do make things look 'real' and the red that comes out after the filter is the real red like how other people see it. But I'm already too used to "my red" that the "real red" just looks fake and odd.
I think these computer compensation controls should be sliders.
However, show me a bright purple figure on a black background and I'll probably tell you it's blank.
What's even more fascinating is that, while these two images are very different to me, what you are actually seeing might be totally different to what I am seeing in the Protanopia image and we won't know.
>Firefox 81 removed unnecessary simulations for protanomaly, deuteranomaly, and tritanomaly, and added a simulation for achromatopsia (no color).
Considering that these are developer tools, *anomaly-variants could be considered "milder" forms of the *anopia-variants, and further come in various degrees.
Further, people with the *anomaly variants can have severe headaches with certain color-schemes, and the best thing to avoid any misunderstandings, is to check for "safe-for-anopia", or/or use a scheme that avoids these altogether, which will also serve everyone on the *anomaly-spectrum.
But that's just my speculation.
The real issue is using a colour photo like the one used in the article because this doesn’t demonstrate the effect of low contrast - a demonstration of lost contrast is much better with bodies of text against problematic background colours, since there is an immediately obvious reduction in legibility, rather than a bit of flourish in a photo.
I will say that I can barely tell the difference between the original example image on this page and the deuteranopia one. According to tests I have a moderate deuteranomaly.
RIP, 3D DOM View (2012 — 2016)
* { outline: 3px outset gray; }I completely lose my mind when I find visualizations that use gradiants of red to green and brown. For example, a US state map that will have 7 different colors of red, green, and brown with a legend for each on the side. It's extremely difficult to line up which color is assigned to a state. Line charts are even worse. Please just use wildly different colors and if possible, label the lines directly.
Sadly the simulate button does not show up in any of my Firefox browsers (version 94.0.2)
Perhaps the feature requires a GPU feature not presented to the vGPU in my virtual machines?
Right.. booted up a physical box that I can access over RDP and there it does show up.
Would be nice to know the hardware requirements for the simulate option.
Now I can just drop images in Firefox and use this tool!