Do you want to explain where "paying for games that you get to keep" entered this conversation?
The logic the GP was using was that exclusivity deals and "the first hit is free" tactics are not ultimately in the customer's interest.
The logic the GP was using was that exclusivity deals and "the first hit is free" tactics are not ultimately in the customer's interest.
the thing EGS IS doing differently, however, is being much more fair to creators of these games, and basing their fees on the actual costs they must incur, instead of just taking as much as they can, which is very much in the consumer's best interest. it's in everyone's best interest, because more profit for most game devs means more games from those devs, and more games are what consumers want.