> all children must always be at the same level up until their last year
But that's not what's happening, so, again, what does that have to do with the actual changes being made?
But that's not what's happening, so, again, what does that have to do with the actual changes being made?
If no to both, it does seem an awful lot like invoking the motivations of some of the people involved as a boogeyman rather than making an argument about the final recommendations themselves.
For schools under the Equitable Math proposals, the goal will be that for any given grade level, all children will be at the same level up until their last year. The explicitly stated reasoning by the program authors is that alternative tracks in math are a form of disparity which promotes White Supremacy. Will this in fact be the final final proposal? That is what is under debate right now.