The urinary leash: how the death of public toilets traps and trammels us all
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
The belief that it is unethical to set and enforce boundaries on the behavior of people in the lowest rungs of society, to prevent anti-social behavior, has spread like a memetic contagion, leading to societal decline.
This pretty much solves this problem beautifully. If you can find a place to eat or drink, you can find a free place to piss.
There is a confluence of at least two government failures behind the emergence of modern suburbs:
* government officials, pushed by NIMBY SFH owners and anti-profit left wing groups, restricting zoning/housing-development in major economic nexuses where the most job opportunities exist, leading to pressure to develop the adjacent suburbs as they are the next best location for housing.
* taxpayer funded left-wing groups pushing for social housing and social services in city cores, leading to neighbourhoods with high concentrations of low-income residents that become breeding grounds for crime, and cause urban decay that leads to the flight of middle class taxpayers to safer suburbs.
http://energyfuse.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/suburb2.gif
Or us that inacurate because it's more of a class privilege than racial privilege?
Point above on white privilege is that I think it would be a lot harder to try it as a black guy...
But, you seem to have misunderstood the metaphor of the headline: This isn't about people going to the loo within the reach of some other leash -- it's about how the lack of public restrooms is the "leash", tying people to within reach of a restroom. With restrooms becoming ever fewer and farther between, these people can only move within ever shrinking circles.