Is this the same backend that is powering https://denigma.app ?
---
That was also the first time I had heard of denigma.app and their tagline of
We stress-tested it on the worst, most obscure code we could find. That's why we're confident it will work on your complex codebase.
gave me a good chuckle since just trivially modifying their example ... sort of worked
Given:
RUN apt-get update && exit 1 && apt-get install -y libnss3 libgtk-3-0 libx11-xcb1 libxss1 libasound2
- Next, apt-get is used to update the system and exit 1 is used to stop any further commands from running.
- Then libnss3, libgtk-3-0, libx11-xcb1, libxss1, and libasound2 are installed using apt-get.
For good fun, I tried another small edit
RUN exit 1 && apt-get update && apt-get install -y libnss3 libgtk-3-0 libx11-xcb1 libxss1 libasound2
- The code then runs an exit command and uses apt-get to update its package list before installing libnss3, libgtk-3-0, libx11-xcb1, libxss1, and asound2.
But my heartburn is the intersection of these two bullet points: "and exit 1 is used to stop any further commands from running", followed by _any other claim_
> obviously wrong code
Based on my experience with code reviews, I'd bet $5 I could put (or leave) "&& exit 1 &&" in the middle of a sea of RUN commands and it'd go unnoticed. So I guess it depends on who the target audience is for both this and the absolutely laughable Labs output: people who don't want to read what an if statement does, or people looking for the _meaning_ of the code?
Garbage in -> garbage out
It is designed for explaining real-world code in context, and performs poorly on esoteric examples.
Since you're hanging out here, what is the explanation for how it can say "exit 1 is used to stop any further commands from running." and then carry on?
It's even more bizarre that it (seems to?) understands what "exit 1" does, but only when it is not the first command in the sequence?