Ah yes of course, when the common view gets the label of “reality” dissent is no longer “dissent.” /s
If only everyone could see the line in the same place, but well if that were the case I don’t suppose there’d be any dissent at all.
I mean that is a common refrain among the various anti-basic science groups, but I'm curious if that is the view you take
You would be very hard pressed to find a self respecting scientist who calls any of their work “objective fact.” There are several ways to display views that are “anti-basic science,” and you are displaying one of them.
But to try and wrangle your question into what I think it was intending (though severely misled such that I needed the above preamble): Do I believe established high probability scientific consensus and recommendations can be discarded or disagreed with as mere opinion? Absolutely not. I am not at all “anti-basic science” in the way that you think I am. I think it’s quite possible to accept the scientific consensus on COVID as it exists so far and still argue currently against mandatory vaccinations in different settings.