Reddit.com has deleted AAAA records and is back to being a legacy website
old.reddit.com
old.reddit.com
If you look at any discussion of for example expanding IPv4 address space, lot's of "experts" come out of the woodwork claiming IPv6 is the same as IPv4 and/or that it is easy. No it is not just an address space expansion and no it is not easy for many use cases.
Even the big players (Azure / GCP) struggle to fully enable an IPv6 only or IPv6 supporting servicing offering across their products.
The only ones making this hard are apathetic engineers who keep kicking the can down the road for the next generation. Arguments against ipv6 are like sailers on a sinking ship bickering with the rescuers that while the ship is completely underwater at this point, they can still float on their backs for a day or two, so their help is unecessesary.
IPv6 is inevitable, you can either deal with it now while it's hard, or deal with it later when ipv4 addresses are too expensive and your infrastructure is already so entrenched that transitioning is a nightmare. The latter is the situation Azure & GCP are slowly finding themselves stuck in, and they have only themselves to blame.
Together, that means there is no need to ever get rid of IPv4 on the internal networks. Yes, maybe the workstations will have IPv6 for random website access, but that old NAS box will always be at 10.1.2.3.
20+ years on, and IPv6 is still hard. This is unlike other things that were hard 20 years ago; TLS was hard 20 years ago, and now it's not so bad. 20 years ago, databases were hard, now they're not so bad. Etc. But IPv6 is still hard, so it shouldn't be surprising that people are still waiting.
OTOH, IPv6 is widely deployed in (many) mobile networks, so using it can eliminate the NAT layer(s) that are almost certainly present for IPv4 on mobile.
Not that they can't hire product managers, they don't hire product managers that understand the audience and what reddit the actual product is. IMO theres better ways to monetize their audience than ads.
You seem to think the product managers have the user's best interest in mind.
It would be so much better to upgrade to a protocol that is directly compatible with IPv4 and does not require deployment and maintenance a second network in parallel to IPv4.
Now, you could have an upgraded system which kept a lot more the same from IPv4 and just added more addresses. But I personally think the extra kitchen sink added in IPv6 is only a small part of why it's adoption has struggled.
A user noticed that Reddit recently turned off its AAAA records, and posted asking why it was now an IPv4-only site.
Nit: if IPv6 is still enabled server-side, it can be used over IPv6 but you can't rely on public DNS for discovery and may have to set Host headers manually.
> Yea, we found a couple of internal issues that need some debugging. Since it's a holiday week we decided to rollback. Better safe than sorry. > > It'll be back, don't worry.
Nothing to see here, really.
Bit more details would have been nice. Now i fear of poorly assuming they made internal network ipv6 too?