One Target store. One spike in shoplifting. What does it mean for SF?
sfchronicle.com
sfchronicle.com
More direct and certified identification of actual theft than comparing units purchased in inventory v. actual purchases of said units. Should make it possible to then quantify thefts by employees v. shoplifters.
Arguing about data gets the City nowhere. Find out what’s actually going on. The sooner, the quicker.
It feels like a case of “we wanted the stats to show one thing, but it didn’t, so let’s cast doubt on the stats.”
It's interesting how one political party is perceived as "pro shop-lifting." I never would have imagined that would be a position any reasonable person would take.
i dont see this is going anyplace good, but at least dont misrepresent the intent
Speaking of not misrepresenting: it’s not murder if a person is killed lawfully.
They criticize the process of people being killed that they find to be unethical/ unlawful. From their point of view the 'killing' of a citizen in those cases is murder. What is and what isn't murder is maybe from a 'legal' point of view clear in those cases (in the discussed country) but this neither applies to all countries nor does it account for the ethical view of this 'killing'
It's the same reason BART doesn't release footage of subway crimes anymore.
https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2017/07/09/bart-withholdin...
Also, who's getting murdered by the sf police? https://www.sanfranciscopolice.org/your-sfpd/published-repor...
That is a statistically tiny number. Making the squares of the 10 shootings safer for pedestrians would save more people than stopping police shootings.
The magnitude of the reaction should never be the metric for urgency. Statistics serve as a much better proxy, especially when the methodology isn't outright false.
[1] https://www.statista.com/statistics/585140/people-shot-to-de...
[2] https://www.statista.com/statistics/585152/people-shot-to-de...