> The “good news” here is that probabilities of 6C warming are reduced from what they have been historically.

So I guess it’s a good thing we didn’t listen to the old science and go scorched earth to prevent what they thought would happen.

The question becomes, why should people trust or believe the new science any more than the old? What if that’s also greatly exaggerated?

Sometimes I wish science were treated more like the fallible concept it is, rather than a religion whose followers can be more fervent than even the most fundamentalist of [insert religion here]