Far from it. In fact, the best thing about a correctness-oriented language like Rust is that you can immediately tell when stuff does not compute (the compiler will error out with a useful diagnostic, or else it will be in a small 'unsafe' block with easy to check safety conditions). Which makes it way easier to be less judgmental about all sorts of stuff.
Whenever people say that a skillful programmer can write well-working C++, I don't disagree, but in my experience it continues to fail on projects with more people involved.
If your project has size N=1, and you're skillful it's not an issue, if you have N=2 or N=3, you might still be able to review everything and find very competent contributors.
But for bigger N, at some point you'll have average or below average skilled contributors in the project, you won't be able to review all contributions.
A strongly typed language, strict compiler, standard formatter, and standard linter however can scale in this way.
Rust offers all of these.
Or an accurate depiction of reality.