Why not DC(instead of AC) for in house wiring?
treehugger.com
treehugger.com
(And then there's the question of what electrical interface we should use -- are we really going to go with USC-C for power delivery despite it's inability to lock into place?)
Worth noting that 120Vac goes considerably higher than 120V. 120 is supposed to be the average, root mean squared. This implies to me we might be able to have lower currents if we wanted to go even higher voltage DC, without having to rewire.
One other note, usb-c defined a locking connector in 2016. There's a m2 screw 6.8mm above the flat of one side of the jack.
ISS isn't afraid to waste some power. The photovoltaic arrays send power to a "sequential shunt unit", which adds resistive load to maintain a constant voltage/current from the array. Admittedly, not applicable when running off battery, but it shows that power efficiency is not really the priority.
Compared to DC which can be rectified from AC by four diodes and a capacitor. It's trivial to convert AC to DC and it basically costs pennies.
Putting some DC bus standard in addition to AC house wiring has a lot of potential benefits but the costs and infelicities, I think, will keep it from happening. "Desk bus" standards have a lot more potential (USB obviously) but things like LED lights already want their own fancy PWM capable power supplies anyway.
As far as I can see, we have a lot of renewable energy generators (solar panels), energy storage (battery power banks), simple household electronics (lights, TV, computers etc) already prefer DC and seem to be containing converters that work hard to convert AC to DC. I get that AC is beneficial for power transmission, but why not use DC at the consumption side?
As in if all my devices were DC, I could put a bunch of solar panels and hook them up to a battery bank and supply the power needs of the house from the battery right? (without needing to convert to AC)
WATTS UP with THAT!