but yeah, more competition is always good.
But I still don't run anything important on it or push the limits of the free tier. Oracle doesn't have a good reputation. Also "Oracle Unbreakable Linux" is literally just RHEL rebranded, but it's not a community project and they don't like to acknowledge it so it feels particularly shameless; especially since they are selling "support" for it.
Hosting is one of those things you really ought to spend 10 minutes reading and find out what you are and are not allowed to do. It's basic due dilligence when you're renting someone else's hardware and bandwidth.
You basically get stuck paying lots for Oracle software and that doesn't directly equate to value the software provides
See also: Bryan Cantrill's "lawnmower" talk about what happened to Solaris after the Oracle acquisition. https://youtu.be/-zRN7XLCRhc
[1]: https://old.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/d1ttzp/oracle_is_...
[2]: https://upperedge.com/oracle/top-3-reasons-oracle-java-users...
I was at a point where I just said "screw this, I don't care about the free trial, just give me an account where I'm supposed to pay for everything". For some reason you have to go through the free trial in order to get a regular account.
I didn't even try out the platform once I got my account. They managed to drain all my energy in the sign-up process.
I'd rather go bankrupt by AWS/GCP nefarious egress fees than having to deal with Oracle again. Serves me right for giving them a shot.
I second the recommendation to stay as far away from Oracle as you can, even if their OCI pricing seems incredible.
Providers always have a false positive rate on signup experiences and last time I looked Oracle had provided a way to contact them and say "You got it wrong" (and they are reasonably good at fixing those situations).